10·
1 year agoOr make a rule that bosses have to try out everything they suggest for others first, let them Darwin award themselves instead of others
Natanael
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
- 0 Posts
- 45 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: August 16th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Wireguard is most reliable in terms of security. For censorship resistance, it’s all about tunneling it in a way that looks indistinguishable from normal traffic
Domain or IP doesn’t make much of a difference. If somebody can block one they can block the other. The trick is not getting flagged. Domain does make it easier to administer though with stuff like dyndns, but then you also need to make sure eSNI is available (especially if it’s on hosting) and that you’re using encrypted DNS lookups
He wanted to be a war lord but all he’s got is a dull edge
The firing is illegal so they don’t have authority to do that
Your workaround is precisely why I said “more practical”. Any updates to your tooling might break it because it’s not an expected usecase
You don’t want FIDO2 security tokens for that, use an OpenPGP applet (works with some Yubikeys and with many programmable smartcards). Much more practical for authenticating a server.
BTW we have a lot of cryptography experts in www.reddit.com/r/crypto (yes I know, I’m trying to get the community moved, I’ve been moderating it for a decade and it’s a slow process)
And all these idiots voted trump “for the economy”
Those 3, and the dozens of white people with “blacks for Trump” shirts around them
Nothing like that has happened, except for all the times IDF soldiers have admitted to doing it, and all the times the leadership had admitted to allowing or encouraging it
There’s just a minority pushing back openly
Remember “blacks for Trump”? Which predominantly was white people?
The comments section though
It’s an editorial decision like any other, it’s nothing new in legal terms
The US definition of liberal doesn’t have much to do with actual freedom / liberalism, it’s mostly conservatives that want free trade
The president’s role is to coordinate, which is heavily dependent on delegation. He’s supposed to pick experts to help carry out the administration’s policy. Are you expecting him to visit all 50 states every single day?
(OTOH yes the presidency has way too much power and it should be redistributed)
Depends. If there’s no preexisting law then yes, he can just cancel orders. But presidents aren’t supposed to be able to override the law.
If there’s a law and it has administrative requirements for revoking a particular status, then one president can order the agency administering it to consider putting something under that status, and the next one has to follow that same laws requirements on how to end that status - and it might not have a provision that next president can put to use.
He has enough Republicans in congress to be able to mess things up by pressuring them
503·2 years agoBiden didn’t give up on debt forgiveness, he pushed 20 different forgiveness schemes instead of trying to get the original 1 scheme reapproved
OTOH that’s mostly a paper democrat
But I’ll take the win