Natanael

You can solve that with state compacts which go into force when you hit a threshold where that’s not a risk

I didn’t say “comply”, just what the consequences would be.

These people need to be Nuremberged

He’ll fire everyone and SCOTUS will let him do it

Define damage. Can it pass through the middle of organs? Sure, if it hits just right. But that’s not so much a question of speed.

You’d need a pin needle shape to have a chance of piercing an organ without causing lasting damage, but it will probably break on impact

Some jurisdictions allow escrow payment when in a legal conflict, in which case you actually might be sending money to your lawyer instead

… Probably doesn’t apply for US taxes, but it’s a thing

The information is out there, maybe reconsider where you’re getting news from? Democrats are asking for healthcare to be protected, and are planning a vote for releasing the Epstein files. Republicans are opposing both.

Republicans are exclusively at fault because they have the speaker position AND a majority of members in both houses and can get back in business whenever. They just don’t have all their own members on board yet, so they need enough Democrats to join to reach a majority, and none will do it.

So Republicans are stuck with a majority they can’t use, and have to negotiate, and refuses to negotiate.

No, I’m describing sending armed security that outnumber what the feds try to send.

If the feds think they still can instigate shit when outnumbered, they might end up starting a civil war - but the states wouldn’t start it.

There’s already other stuff like the health compacts in place between some states. Voting safety compacts might also happen

Yes, that’s the order it has to be done in. And once GOP is out and voting is reformed, you can introduce better parties

Only the smaller states are at any real risk, and only if they don’t cooperate with the larger democratic states to place troops to protect the sites

There’s more than enough available to the states if they decide to enforce safety that the feds simply can’t do anything

Get Republicans out, then fix the damn system by changing the voting system so you guys can finally have more than 2 parties

You have no idea how few the federal troops really are, you think they’re more powerful than they are because you’ve only seen reports on where they’ve been striking performatively.

If Trump sent every federal agent they had into New York city, the city could dedicate less than half of their police force to arrest them all. They wouldn’t need to call the national guard, or any other security forces.

And then there’s no feds left to try anything in any other state.

You’re missing my point by miles, do something to oppose him then!

Who’s the one with talking points? Because that one’s from the constitution. Push the states to oppose Trump’s interference

Constitution says no and states get to enforce that no

States are responsible for elections, not the feds

You guys girls have an education?

Amazon Ring does, not seeing evidence of Wyze doing that (but also no evidence they haven’t, just their claim they require warrants for it)

The distinction used for the textbook definition of propaganda is essentially to set a narrative the way you want it to by hammering in a specific story with your angle (typically by flooding the relevant channels of communication with variants of your story). Controlling perception.

Regular communication which isn’t that isn’t propaganda.

By that measure everything ever is propaganda

If staff of disintegrating can be activated remotely you can make traps with it