• shaiatan@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The number of “left” voters in this community that are doing their damnedest to get Trump elected never ceases to disturb me.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The number of pro-genocide centrists who accuse anyone who doesn’t love genocide as much as they do of being trumpers will never surprise me.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Saying they are “pro-genocide” is beyond hyperbolic.

        These type of extreme, over the top comments hurt way more than help.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          These type of extreme, over the top comments hurt way more than help.

          Hurt what? The tender fee-fee’s of pro-genocide centrists? If they don’t want to be called pro-genocide, they should stop supporting genocide. If they don’t want to be called pro-genocide, they should stand firm on literally any other issue. But they fucking don’t. Everything else is up for negotiation. Everything else is fertile ground for capitulation. Not genocide. That’s the only thing centrists won’t budge on.

          • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            damn right

            Harris could easily at this point make her own platform to run on that includes what the voters are asking for

            her refusal to acknowledge the voters’ concerns is very telling

    • isaaclw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The way Harris refuses to court her own voting base never ceases to disturb me

      Ftfy.

      Its not on voters. Voters will do what they will do. Its on politicians who we vote for. Also I will be voting for Harris and also protesting at every event where I can to demand this apartheid and genocide to end.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Stop making Israel an election issue and worry about your own damn country. If you want to vote on Israel’s future move there, become a citizen and vote. But you live in the u.s, put down your world police badge and vote on your country’s matters. If not a single one of your leaders and candidates supports an issue, IT’S NOT AN ELECTION ISSUE.

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          YOUR TAX DOLLARS WILL BE USED TO MURDER CHILDREN AND THERE’S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT NOW GO VOTE FOR THE GENOCIDER LIKE A GOOD CITIZEN

          • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Funny, suddenly you all care that your money is being used to kill people. You cheered it when it was my people. Now you morally grandstand and wonder why some of us think you Americans are hypocrites

            • Makhno@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              You cheered it when it was my people

              Yeah dude, we all got around a fire and jerked eachother off about it

  • Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    And there it is, colors shown true.

    The US is an oligarchy in everything but name. The average voter doesn’t want this policy, but that’s not what matters for Harris. That’s not what matters in an oligarchy.

    What matters is the few with means, not most.

    • WamGams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The numbers I have seen state that about 60% of Americans support Israel, with 25% unsure which side they support in the conflict.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        60 percent support it’s existence. Support for them blowing up Gaza is far lower. Conflating the two is a common Israeli propaganda theme. Even to declaring that Hamas would genocide them if they didn’t do this.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    How many thousands of women and children were simply LIVING in their homes when Israel voluntarily and with full knowledge of their civilian presence dropped a 1,000lb JDAM on them to eliminate a singular HAMAS target or two?

    Look I’m voting for Harris but I really, really dislike how she goes into explicit detail on the events of October 7th but doesn’t go into explicit detail on Palestinians crushed, decapitated, blown in half or to bits by explosives, maimed, shot, and yes sometimes raped by IDF.

    This double-standard of evocative imagery is in itself pretty disturbing.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      How many thousands of women and children were simply LIVING in their homes when Israel voluntarily and with full knowledge of their civilian presence dropped a 1,000lb JDAM on them to eliminate a singular HAMAS target or two?

      Fuck the men that didn’t want to die, I guess

      • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Women and children are generally given as examples because they’re widely perceived as unambiguously not combatants compared to men by most people.

        Nobody’s saying "fuck the men that didn’t want to die". If someone says "how many women and girls were simply living their lives when they were sexually assaulted" and your immediate and only response is "so what, no one cares about men and boys who were sexually assaulted?", can you see why that’s kind of a nonsensical conclusion to make?

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Exactly. Pretty obvious because it leaves no low-hanging fruit for an Israeli apologist to say something like, “those men were probably Hamas.”

          It just makes for a more tight and rhetorically effective argument.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If this bothers you then vote for some candidate and party other than Harris and the dems.

    I like PSL.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, because the only thing elections track is approval. If genocide is too much for a person to approve of then they need to vote for a different candidate.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will generally not recommend people vote for or support the greens because they represent a directionless triangulation with no vision.

        I’ve had the opportunity to vote green in every national election they’ve been in and even chosen them a few times and they’ve always let me down.

        • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s that kind of attitude that weakens the left. If every leftist were involved with the greens, we could create a truly revolutionary party.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            perhaps by changing the party into something entirely different from within. of course that would require a lot of work to overcome 25 years of institutional inertia, let alone a big job of completely changing the party’s strategy and operation.

            i would even make the argument that the greens aren’t left, since they aren’t calling for worker control of the means of production and historically that’s been the bare minimum to be considered left but using the french seating chart hundreds of years later has its own issues.

            • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well I don’t see nearly as much ballot access from the PSL or any other minor party. Maybe we should make a new party that’ll lose popularity to the next one in 5 years. No party will ever be leftist enough for leftists in this country and that pretentious mindset will keep us weak forever.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                How does that saying go? “If ballot access were candy and nuts we’d all be eating steak!”

                There are absolutely ultras in America but it’s not a position necessary to recognize that the Green Party isn’t leftist. I’d say at the very least the greens can’t be called leftist for the same reason the dubious moniker “progressive” isn’t any marker of the same: their platform is explicitly not left.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        propaganda from both parties keep people at the bottom of the juice pitcher unable to breath fresh air and there are too few not drinking the punch to do anything

        huge crab effect going on here

        like when you go crabbing and put all the crabs in the bucket and the crabs that almost get out get stopped by their peers

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Terrible idea. A better plan is vote progressives into congress. The presidency literally doesn’t matter. Congress gets to dictate almost everything the President can do.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I guess if you don’t care who gets in then yeah.

        I’m personally past just voting for the “least bad” candidate no matter how that’s determined. It’s candidates I actually want from here on out.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          You do that. And if/when Trump wins and gives Netanyahu the ok to turn Palestine into glass then turn it into luxury apartments for violent Americans, and he does, then those people’s blood will be on your hands. Remember that.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’ll be my fault… why?

            Will it be because I’m responsible for the choices my government makes? Wouldn’t the blood also be on the hands of the “progressive” voters? The Harris voters?

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Because every vote counts, and there are only two possible outcomes.

              Buddy, you know why. You can pretend online that you don’t understand it, but I know you’re smart enough to get it, and deep down, you know that what I’m saying is true.

              Either you feel emboldened to say it because it looks like Kamala might win, so therefore you think you can just throw your vote away, or you know exactly what you’re doing.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m old enough to have been able to vote in the 2000 election. Is the blood from 600 thousand Iraqis on my hands too?

                If I were choosing the vote that makes me least responsible for the genocide in Gaza wouldn’t I choose a candidate who opposes it in both word and deed?

                If what you said were true and I really was responsible for the actions of my government through my vote, wouldn’t it make sense to focus on getting voting records from diebold or whatever so you could use that information to target your vitriol at the people most responsible for this nations cruel actions?

                I don’t think you’ve seriously thought what you’re saying through.