

That’s what it should be, but it’s not the motivation for everyone with a D by their name…
Some Dems are doing it for the right reasons
Oversimplification kills.


That’s what it should be, but it’s not the motivation for everyone with a D by their name…
Some Dems are doing it for the right reasons
Oversimplification kills.
Really emotional response. Doesn’t leave a lot of room for reason. Probably explains all those wild, loaded questions. Also not sure what “strange-less” is but I’m sure you nailed me.
That’s a lot of words without ever answering my question. Telling.
I didn’t ask what I can do, I don’t need the help of an online troll. I asked what you’re doing.
Yeah for real. Real men do real shit. How you fighting fascism?


Literally every sentence of your first comment was an attack on my character and made assumptions about my beliefs. The fucking audacity.
You mean the one where you did nothing but complain about what people are doing, saying it’s not enough, while offering 0 alternatives? Yeah you sound like a complainer that wants someone else to solve their problem. You didn’t seem interested in putting any effort into trying to solve the problem, just attacking others for the way they are trying.
I didn’t attack you character, I called it out for what it was.
You just want to bitch and attack people because you don’t think they’re doing enough. You don’t think people will save you, then wtf are you doing huh? You demand that people act and others won’t save you, what are you doing aside from waiting to be saved? Bitching at other others for not fighting the way you think they should?
Then I called out that that is a defeatist mindset and your response was that you know the future and are just trying to tell people what will and won’t work, because you’re the one who knows the truth.
Yeah I called out your character, you presented yourself as a negative defeatist who thinks they know the future. You complain how other people fight as not being the right way while doing nothing yourself. All based on anger and ego. Ego you still hold onto.
I dont even see a need to respond to this schizo post in detail.
Well that one way to avoid all the contradictions and local fallacies.
Literally all i did was respond to someone overly optimistic with a probably very realistic prediction of what will happen. To fight a political or literal war you cant be deluding yourself into believing that someone else will save you through legal challenges.
You’re whole stance is based on you thinking you know the future. It’s wild that you can’t see that.
“Probably a realistic prediction” lol, it might be a realistic guess of the future, maybe. Jfc man, if that’s good enough reason for you to roll over, so be it. I guess you can just keep waiting for someone to save you while you bitch online.
To fight a political or literal war you cant be deluding yourself into believing that someone else will save you through legal challenges.
I never said this. You keep bringing this up, I didn’t say you could. You’re making up a problem and arguing about it.
I dont even see a need to respond to this schizo post in detail.


You act like you know the future, what will happen like it’s set in stone, and that it will be horrible. You sound like a defeatist and/or extremist. Neither of which are known for their rock solid logic.
You continue to do that behavior in this comment as well.
Shit is loooong past the “lets sue our way out of this” stage.
And…
Because “everyone throughout history” has also tried suing their way out of fascism and that really didnt work for them at fucking all my guy.
I never said you could sue your way out, why is this your response? You’re original comment didn’t even mention that. Jesus, you’re building random strawmen and working off assumptions. You don’t know my stance beyond that I disagree with a vague aspect of yours. I could agree that suing is pointless, you have no idea. Why even bring this up? Because you assumed that’s what I was talking about or thinking?
You’re fabricating things so you have something to attack. You’re so blinded by hate you’re ready to attack anyone that disagrees with you, to the point of making up assumptions to have something to argue about. That’s no better than MAGA ffs. Try using thoughts, not emotions. We’re better than this, man.
While i really do appreciate peace and not being violent, when being faced with unjust violence, sometimes you just have a moral obligation to become violent yourself.
Cool. And I’m sure once you realize that everyone might not have the same idea of who the right people to attack are, or what the right way to go about it is you might think: wow, we should have been a little more thoughtful in our approach and not treated violence like the only option. Instead, we should have looked at it like a tool in a belt of other strong tools. Because if you think killing Trump magically fixes America, as your little skit implies, you’re naive. He could easily become a martyr for those people. What would that mean? Have you thought about that?


Yeah, just give up and roll over. No point it trying or fighting, just take it and let them win. No reason to even try to hope.
This sounds like a coward who’s ready to give up before even fighting. Maybe you’re ready to accept all that, some of us aren’t. Keep your doom and gloom to yourself, you’re helping no one.
If everyone throughout history thought like you then the world would be a much worse place.


I agree, they could have stopped the mad man. But right now there’s a mad man going crazy and they’re blaming everyone else. It’s wild.


Problem is he has the whole government in his pocket. It’s optimistic to think the election will be fair or that anyone would be willing to put chains on him. He fired everyone who doesn’t bow to him.
Every time I see a slightly distorted AI person I like to think they’re real and actually look like that.
Lol and the funny thing is this is what Republicans do. Make a bold, wild claim, then when facts and reason are injected just insult the person who said it and refuse to answer.
What about ism at it’s finest.
Dems voted to release, right voted against. That’s a pretty clear picture.


But that’s not how voting for a direction works. I think this analogy is just starting to fall apart after this much discussion, we’ve taken it too far haha.
Listen, I’m all for taking out the trash and not just taking small wins to survive, but I just don’t see the path. I might be missing it, there’s plenty I don’t know, but survival at least would have let us survive a little longer.


Yeah, I think not going off a cliff is pretty important though.


Bad ice ream is still better than driving off a cliff. You can tell me all day how bad the ice cream is and how shitty the place is because they don’t even try to make good ice cream, they don’t even try to get customers or do a good job. It’s still better than driving off a cliff. I wouldn’t blame the ice cream store for making shitty when people choose not to vote for it. They knew the alternative and still decided to leave it up to fate.
Sure, a nice ice cream shop is easier to get people to vote on, but when the alternative is going off a cliff, the ice cream is kind of a moot point. But sure, let’s blame the ice cream shop for not being attractive enough when anything but going off the cliff should be the obvious choice. Yes, the ice cream shop could have made it easier, but any sane person can see she obvious choice.
Let’s put it this way. If one side is saying they will kill everyone who isn’t straight and white, and the other side says they want to ban gay marriage. Now I think queer rights is really important but I would vote for the second to prevent the firsr. But people seem to be screaming “I’m never voting against gay rights!” Cool, so when the other guy wins and it’s way worse, at least you feel good.


So you’re a gold digger that’s giddy at the thought of people dying because your sugar daddy has more money now.
You’re truly a bad person.


Reading is hard, I get it. Just say what you want to be true like it is.


It doesn’t but I still wanna see em
Wait, she was giving the speech while walking up there?
Seizing other things, like the means of production would also be pretty nifty.