Just because competition can be suppressed temporarily within a discrete system doesn’t mean it has ceased to exist. Exactly why ideologies that demand the absence of competition will eventually be outcompeted from the outside.
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
The health of the current system is undenianly declining, absolutely. But competition is eternal and non-optional, so systems that seek to eliminate it are intrinsically doomed.
Well, competition has been going pretty strong for the last four billion years; time will tell.
Yes, exactly! For all the noxious effects of greed, it drives competition which drives evolution.
Even if a utopian communist/anarchist society were able to stabilize on its own, it would inevitably be overcome at some point in the future by a more competitive society that had martially evolved beyond the utopia’s understanding.
Whether its right or wrong has no bearing on the entropy of it.
What a goofy take. “Having trouble with self control? Have you tried having self control?” Obviously there’s something more going on or life would be a whole lot simpler. Sometimes externalizing a decision through a tool like a timer is part of how a person indirectly exerts self control.
Captures from an Internet Archive sweep of the web. There are so many captures since the domain has been active since the 90s and was part of a great many scans.
Binary speed is really the least reason to do it. Whether it’s worth it or not is up to the individual, but there are a lot of little reasons Gentoo is uniquely powerful.
Benefits specific to compiling:
- fine-grained control of features and dependencies with USE flags
- very easy package maintenance (writing ebuilds)
- much simpler to add your own custom local packages when you need them
- less workload on the gentoo team which is good for repository health and breadth
- control of compile flags (yes speed, but more practically hardening for secure systems)
- the same gentoo is available on way more platforms and architectures than any binary distro
Who said anything about capitalism? I’m talking about centralization. Expecting countless individuals to be able to do something as well as specialists can do it just doesn’t make sense to me.
“Personal responsibility” is a red herring used by those in power to try and shift the blame off of institutions with real power. We need institutional change first and foremost.
Off-gridders are primarily dilettantes who have the money to pretend they’re disconnected from the system.
I see what you’re saying. I find it hard to believe vanlifers and offgridders are the vanguard of a more sustainable future though.
I don’t see how all the world’s people individually handling waste can work better than centralized expert processing, especially in more dense areas.
Off-grid living more environmental than proper municipal water treatment? How do you figure?
If you’ve got a complex and potentially nested object, what does the body of this simple function look like? That’s what they mean.
zagaberoo@beehaw.orgto
Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•Compiz fusion gave me what a degree barely could
0·3 years agoGentoo: not even once.

I just the other day edited a Steam config file with some wacky file extension by cracking it open in notepad. Bless plain text.