- 25 Posts
- 35 Comments
Wouldn’t that also be the case with stories like George Floyd. Cops kill a lot of people every year. I’m not saying it shouldn’t have been a story, but that was the motive in making that one story a story. So it obviously happens in both directions. Wouldn’t it be worse if it could happen in one direction but any information in the other direction was stuffed under a rug? Then our sense of reality would be completely manipulated.
But we don’t have to go with Newsom yet. AOC is more electable, by a lot, and just better.
https://goatmatrix.net/c/FutureAnalysis/6e7EQfHEZC
If we are smart we convince her to announce as early as possible before we have too deal with excessive amounts of Newsom momentum. Get her to announce and kick Patrick Bateman out of the race ASAP.
Removed by mod
Now do communism.
How many topics on the front page are not the Epstein file? Should we complain at all of those posts? It’s ridiculous. I guess we can’t talk about the genocide in Gaza either until the list is released. This is the problem with the “but this is not the topic I think is important” argument. One could make a counter claim against their preferred issue with any other important issue. How dare we even bring up the Epstein list while a genocide is happening? …would say someone who doesn’t want the Epstein list released. Shoe horn arguments are only used by dishonest people. “No topic can exist by my topic” is kind of a ridiculous claim.
1·1 year agoHe does support Israel.
It’s funny. A lot on the right say the same thing about their representatives. They even call them RINOs (republican in name only). Funny how when republicans take control the spending goes up anyway.
It’s almost like either party doesn’t actually do what they say they do and have an entirely different agenda. It would be interesting to see on what issues congressional dems and republicans agree on that the public disagrees with them on. That might tell us what the actual agenda is.
There is something people are missing with Bernie. Bernie does happen to be Jewish, but he is not a Zionist, unlike for example Chuck Shumer. Then Hillary is not Jewish but she is a Zionist.
The control system prefers Zionists for legislative positions but they absolutely require Zionists for administrative positions. So much so they won’t let someone escape a primary without the machine kicking into play. Even at the state level.
What it actually makes them is zionist controlled opposition. You don’t get zionist occupied government without having zionist occupied parties. The US government does whatever is good for Israel even if it is bad for the American people, so yes, we have zionist occupied government.
So you shouldn’t be surprised that the current in power dems have more loyalty to that than any ideology / policy take. It’s a club and they have to maintain it by controlling who’s in it.
The guy, unfortunately for him, has a very human and natural position on Gazan genicide. And that’s just not permissible.
It’s very simple. One of these people blindly supports Israel no matter what it does, up to and including genocide, and the other one doesn’t.
What was right wing about him?
I originally got it from here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/1l7b1ht/hell_yeah/
Interesting to see how the same thing gets responded to elsewhere:
https://saidit.net/s/AnarchoCapitalism/comments/grv1/if_there_is_no_justice/ https://goatmatrix.net/c/Ancap/8WL1eVUPsM
My position is that no politician deserves respect.
What we found out was that wiping an entire civilization or culture off the map was a lot harder than we realized. We couldn’t unseat the existence of an agrarianist regime with the level of economy you would expect from a country with no water access, even after we applied 50% of what our current debt was at the time to do it.
These leaders may have had the same thought you did, that at that time we had that capacity. But it was shown to be a bluff.
J6. But if they do less than that it will be an outrage!