https://youtu.be/l3fAcxcxoZ8

And his father? Because it also says clearly that as long as one parent is a green card holder or citizen that citizen ship is granted.

Imagine a primary with AOC, Pete Buttegieg, and maybe a third younger candidate…

All could be really exciting to see advance, but they’ll split the vote and open the way for some stupid fucking corpse to win.

I hate this system.

I’m with you in your frustration, but this only furthers a class of elites being eligible to govern. The test needs to be at a level that anyone going through compulsory education could pass. Eg 8th grade.

Additionally, I would do the test at candidate registration. There is no pass fail, but the electorate can decide if they’re qualified enough (as it’s the right of the electorate).

Maybe it doesn’t fix it fully but we can directly point to who is a moron, and who voted for said morons.

See you in 2032

Only two of what you mentioned are American brands, which is probably pretty relevant for a Senator to consider.

I thought the same, but some googling seems to suggest not

Nobody buys less stuff with a single day boycotts. They just shifted their purchases before or after.

And how does it look when he fires the guy investigating his son? That’s the same shit we derided trump for doing… tinkering with the Justice Department which has long operated with a high degree of independence for exactly these reasons.

No win situation for Biden, who assumed he would get another term in office. Don’t pretend it isn’t anything but.

Even if the court says they can’t revoke, the court has no power to stop them.

Yes, and you abolish FPTP and now you elect a president how? I’m interested in your proposal, because it’s incomplete to say get rid of FPTP… Otherwise top vote getter, who gets maybe 30% of the vote leads the country which is also an abomination as 70% didn’t vote for that person.

Abolishing FPTP requires doing something else on top of it, ranked choice or run off would be better than the highest count.

Okay so you go with what system?

Let’s say the breakdown of votes looks the same as the Swedish breakdown. There will be more people that voted for a different candidate than the red one (Social Democrat).

This then requires a run off system like france, or a ranked choice, which is also fine to propose, but you can’t hold up a visual of a parliament and say the system is so much better, when we talk about one singular office.

The post compared two things that have different end goals

This fixes congress. How does this fix the presidency, which is one single office?

All they need is 5 SCOTUS justices to agree the text means whatever.

Then you need a different SCOTUS session to disagree or all of that to fix the text

That’s some Sov Cit level legal gymnastics.

“This undocumented immigrant is just travelling, we have no jurisdiction over them”

Blue states and red states split as per last election map with exceptions that:

Virgina, Illinois, Minnesota can go red… Arizona will go blue.

We take most of the burden for the Mexican border, they should be happy about that, right?

So why do women who doomed this country still get to enjoy the finer things?

It’s not like women turned out in droves for Harris either. Who’s going to withhold from the women that dropped the ball?

Originally started typing something to a completely different post. Whoops.

But yes, that becomes the challenge when deciding to stake employees versus a simple profit share.

Staking employees gives them longer term incentives, whereas profit sharing will be fundamentally a sales commission.

deleted by creator