vaguerant

This was so funny I had to double-check the linked article: yes, this part is also real.

I would kind of argue it’s Fox News that lied on this one. They edited down his full response which was a lot more sketchy about whether he would release the files.

In the interview, co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy asked whether Trump would declassify “9/11 files” and “JFK files.” He said yes without hesitation. Then she asked, “Would you declassify the Epstein files?”

His answer, as it initially aired: “Yeah, yeah, I would.”

But in the full version that only aired later, Trump said, “Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would. I think that less so because, you don’t know, you don’t want to affect people’s lives if it’s phony stuff in there, because it’s a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would, or at least—”

Campos-Duffy interjected and said, “Do you think that would restore trust? Help restore trust?”

Trump hedged again: “I don’t know about Epstein, so much as I do the others. Certainly, about the way he died. It’d be interesting to find out what happened there, because that was a weird situation and the cameras didn’t happen to be working, etc., etc. But yeah, I’d go a long way toward that one. The other stuff, I would.”

His actual answer hedges on how much or whether he’d release any of the Epstein files and especially the actually damaging stuff, preferring to release only the stuff about how he died while casting aspersions about the reliability of the whole … pedo jet and island part. Fox edited him down to a more agreeable position than the one he actually held.

In fairness, space is as far away from the subway as anybody’s ever been.

♫ I still dream of QAnon ♫

(To the tune of Kate Bush’s “Cloudbusting”.)

Sorry if I’m misreading, but I wonder if you’re mixing up Steve Bannon (71) and Barron Trump (19). The Tweet says “Bannon” and is probably meant to imply the former. Steve Bannon is probably too old to have ever been victimized by Jeffrey Epstein; they are/were the same age.

Do we have our own /r/wowthanksimcured yet?

tfw boston thinks you’re being racist

I know this is the least bad part of the story, but it stuck out anyway:

After a lengthy drive to the bar, Strobel said he stepped inside to use the men’s room. However, there were no stalls—only urinals, rendering it inaccessible to him as a trans man.

Precisely where are men supposed to shit in this establishment?

I grew up before the Internet was mainstream and I don’t remember this. We all had access to basically the same information and some of us still had worse or better ideas than our peers. Access was always only one part of the equation; beyond that, you need the information to be useful and accurate (big problem on the Internet), you need the desire to engage with that information, the ability to process and understand it correctly, the ability to discern when factual information is being cherry-picked or otherwise used in misleading ways …

If you trip over on any of those points or whatever else I’ve forgotten to mention, you come out the other end with bad information, access be damned.

In a two-party system like the US, assuming all supporters of a particular candidate share their ideals is folly. There’s a major difference between being someone who actively describes themself as a “moderate” or “centrist” and somebody who just happens to be a voter in a flawed democracy.

Jeffrey Toobin was pretty good at it.

That or she only reads the ones with the blue checkmarks.

https://xcancel.com/NancyMace/status/1913723311386952073

Not that I’m aware of, but Lemmy-compatible fediverse server software like Mbin does calculate a Reputation score for all threadiverse users, including people from Lemmy. I went into a bit more detail about it in this comment. Mbin users can see Reputation scores for other fediverse users, but because this whole system is decentralized, it’s only the score as known about by that server, so it’s not a complete picture of the “real” score.

You’re probably somewhere in the high 600s, but I am estimating. I think the info exists in the backend, but Lemmy deliberately doesn’t make it available anywhere because of the things it encourages–stealing and reposting content for karma farming, judging which people are worth talking to by how well they conform to the dominant opinions, etc. Admittedly, that second one is exactly what I used it for earlier, but -11,000 is a lot so I’m not too worried about it.

The scores used to be accessible via the API, so some Lemmy apps used to show them, but ultimately the feature was removed on the Lemmy end, i.e. Lemmy servers no longer provide that data to apps. I’m not aware of any way to see karma totals within the Lemmy interface today.

That said, the threadiverse is made up of more than just Lemmy: you can interact with Lemmy users and vice versa from other federated sites running Mbin, PieFed and eventually Sublinks when that software is ready. I’m not sure about the other two, but Mbin sites support a Reputation count which is the karma equivalent, so it is possible to see a user’s Reputation from an Mbin server. Here’s a link to your profile as viewed from kbin.earth, a popular Mbin server.

Boring technical “Well actually” stuff: The nature of federation means that the scores visible from remote servers are incomplete: what you’re really seeing is the user’s Reputation based on posts the remote server knows about. e.g. Somebody looking at your profile from kbin.earth will see your Reputation as 664, but somebody looking at you from fedia.io sees you with 609.

This probably means something pretty simple, like that you comment in more communities followed by kbin.earth users than fedia.io users, so the kbin.earth server has “seen” more of your posts in order to calculate a higher Reputation score. Alternatively, you might have one super unpopular post that fedia.io saw and kbin.earth didn’t, which got -56 points. But the first guess is more likely, unless you know otherwise. :P

I know Lemmy doesn’t support karma scores for a reason, but in case it helps you decide which people you want to continue to hear from, the commenter you’re replying to would have almost -11,000 (negative eleven thousand) karma, were Lemmy to support such a thing.

He prefers to groom Ivanka anyway.

I keep seeing opinion pieces like this, but I remain unconvinced. Sure, if his sincerely held intention was to do anything at all positive for the US and its allies, his actions would read as insane. But if he actively, deliberately desires to harm and destabilize both, then he’s going about it the right way. Screw Hanlon’s razor: stupidity is inadequate to explain any of this.

And worst of all, Rob Schneider is there.

They’re considering 26% to be low. There’s 46% support for military round-ups and internment camps among Republican voters compared with 26% among all voters surveyed.