What is this Linuxos? I only know Lunix, made by a soviet hacker named Linyos Torovoltos
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
twei@discuss.tchncs.deto
politics @lemmy.world•‘We’re going to rip your face off’ in visa fight, Steve Bannon warns Elon Musk
6·2 years agoWho’s that in the third corner? Oh no it’s LUIGI MANGIONE WITH AN FGC-9
Using Docker in a VM on a Hypervisor is industry standard, using docker inside of docker may be okay for CI purposes but I wouldn’t do anything more than that in production if it’s not necessary.
The stack from the image above (Windows>WSL> Docker>Minikube>Docker>App) is something you’d use on a dev machine (not a “real”, production-like test environment), in which case you don’t really care about the performance loss
That’s the most reasonable part of the image
twei@discuss.tchncs.deto
politics @lemmy.world•Donald Trump turns down second debate with Kamala Harris
8·2 years agoOr say “Wow the crowd is going crazy for you Mr. Trump” followed by a shot of an empty row of seats
twei@discuss.tchncs.deto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Follow up on supporting Immich announcement - change of wordingEnglish
01·2 years agoI could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense
That guy was talking about grayjay, a Client to follow creators on multiple platforms at the same time. Grayjay isn’t licensed under AGPL, but instead it uses the FUTO Temporary License. It technically still counts as source available, but I think the NC-Part is okay to have. AGPL would be nicer though especially bc of this.
Germany has a fund like that, GNOME just recently got a grant of about 1M Euros to improve features and provide better accessibility
The only thing I can see in their License that would make it non-free is the non-commercial redistribution part of it, which is not that bad


Isn’t that description pretty accurate?