I came from vi, and use Emacs keys. This was quite some time ago so there weren’t hoards of people telling me modal was superior and I should miss it, so I didn’t. I don’t think anything about it is more “kinda weird” than vi modal editing - just unfamiliar (as vi/vim once was), especially if you’re not familiar with standard readline cursor control as also used in OS X.

we can’t even vi" or ci" in emacs

You should perhaps explain what this is and why it’s essential. Funny to complain that you need a package for multiple cursors; people more often complain there’s too much built into Emacs by default. It’s easy to add though.

The long and the short of it is, if you persist in trying to use familiar vim workflows in Emacs, you’re swimming against the tide. More productive is to try to use Emacs in its own terms. Many vim->Emacs people persistently get hung up on basically “I find it awkward to use this vim workflow in Emacs”, and of course they do. It’s equally awkward to try to use Emacs workflows in vim.

And yet there’s a big push to rename git “master” branches, which have no slave connotations and are more analogous to master recordings.

Its not like I’ll fight it, but it’s stupid.

You do? Because I don’t. There is nothing racist about the concept of master. Is a masterpiece racist? Are master tapes, Are post-graduate degrees racist? We may as well declare “work” insensitive because slaves had to work.

Don’t get me wrong, there are many terms we should adjust. I just can’t see how “master” is one of them.