its dissolution have been studied by every single communist party in existence thoroughly
What’s their conclusion?
its dissolution have been studied by every single communist party in existence thoroughly
What’s their conclusion?
Shouldn’t a liberal person grant the right to own guns if they are the Capitalism-liking kind of liberal?
What if the conflicts come from immigrants still wanting freedoms that the natives have given up for a long time and just pretend to have?
The lie is the omission of the fourth group of the people who hate guns.


Iran, Afghanistan - the USA used Islam to end Communism. How can both coexist as foundations for a country?
How could that work? I was thinking more of something like unions or red cross volunteers.
This wouldn’t be needed if people had somebody to turn to who would explain to them what would be their best option.


Which ancient cultures have seen it differently?


He is quoting an old meme.
The president only enforces rights, or not. Congress changes rights.
They can ask the Natives for food again.


If she would run for president and win against a rerunning Kamala Harris, that would be funny.
The meme is not convincing because western workers compare their lives with those in the rest of the world and they observe that their’s better. They ignore the bad things about bananas. https://feddit.org/post/20640578
Because the others could actually change society.


It’s brown people. We don’t care about those special military operations.
Why is the burden of building trust on NATO when Russia had just gotten done occupying and oppressing half of Europe?
There is no obligation for it. It would just have been the complementary option to including Russia into Nato. The chosen third option has led to where we are now.
why don’t you articulate the point you’re trying to get across
The US have an interest in keeping Russia small. Some actions can also be explained by Russia trying to limit external influence.
If you’re claiming Russia’s atrocities against Ukraine, Georgia, Chechnya, Syria, (and everywhere they’ve sent the Nazi mercs Wagner is all to keep power, you’re insane.
Maybe I am insane but I didn’t make that claim. Maintaining some level of power that is too much for Nato membership doesn’t imply offensive actions. Furthermore these involvements came after the window for Nato membership.
Why abandon the military alliance when you don’t know if the enemy is truly gone?
To build trust.
Russia does this shit because the Russian gov is imperialist
Russia is also the prize. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
but the Russians must have objected to being treated like any weak economy. This should be the actual reason why Russia is not part of Nato.
Idk what you’re even trying to say here
Suggesting that they wouldn’t dismantle their power to the point that they get a regime change for independent politics like nationalizing the oil industry.
at no point in NATO’s existence had inviting Russia into the fold made any strategic sense.
Nato after 1991 also didn’t make strategic sense with a crumbled Russia.
What about all other countries not being part of a strong military alliance? Why do only the most prosperous and strong countries feel threatened?
Either dissolving Nato or inviting Russia would have created the opportunity to fully implement the idea of the UN and leave conflicts behind.
The problem is that we also have Capitalism. The UN doesn’t limit the power of billionaires. That’s fine within the West but the Russians must have objected to being treated like any weak economy. This should be the actual reason why Russia is not part of Nato.
Does this make him the highest-paid athlete?