The article seems to confuse “fun” with “tacky corporate eyesores.” It talks a lot about “public art,” but almost all its examples are branded photo ops thrown up by international megacorporations to generate Instagram posts. I love that Boston isn’t crammed with that crap—if you want to be bombarded with ads masquerading as culture, you can go to Times Square.
I’m very conflicted about that community because on the one hand they’re exactly correct that car-centric infrastructure is a fucking atrocity but on the other hand they elide that directly into demonizing car owners with seemingly no understanding that car-centric infrastructure makes car ownership mandatory in many places.
Oh cool, we’re schizoposting again
Those are arguably the most “made for humans” languages—they’re made to make humans laugh and/or headbutt a railroad spike in frustration
The quoted line omits the beginning “on the other.” It still doesn’t technically have a verb, but the construction makes the implied “is” perfectly coherent.