t.b.f the reporting is more about whether these companies have hidden loans (including possibly loans that other lenders don’t know about), which could have happened within railway companies just as easily as in car companies!

deleted by creator

What travels faster - blood from an artery, or Wikipedia’s accuracy on the 3rd word of a person’s page?

oh no, small farms will go bankrupt and have to sell to larger farms that Trump’s friends own… Oops, what an accidental bribe!

…and on your electric [“hydro”] bill, if Canada doesn’t just completely shut off your electricity!

Does the king’s “official birthday” count? If so, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trooping_the_Colour

deleted by creator

Gamers Nexus just talked to some PC manufacturers about this.

“We assemble PCs, made in America from these parts”

(motherboard, CPU, graphics card, PSU, …)

So what if, for example, the motherboard manufacturer moved to the US?

Well that’s an assembly of a hundred or so other Chinese components. And the equipment needed to manufacture it would need to be imported.

Ok, but what if all those hundreds of factories were built in the US?

Well, they all use imported aluminium and steel and plastic, etc., and require their own imported machines to produce…

“Is any part of your PC entirely made in the US?”

“The shipping labels? And maybe some packaging”

Government official work => no copyright?

And in Germany although that at least required some actual hacking.

FMCS’s job is literally to make the economy work better!

just running it locally, apparently. The output of this model is being filtered by another AI, but only on the public-hosted copy.

So was withholding the ATGMs for Ukraine in 2019

Saw someone wearing that shirt in a shopping mall in the UK!

Hell has frozen over.

Another Arkell v Pressdram response 😂

Got any more of 'dem pixels?

TFW “npm install somePackage” adds hundreds of names to your supplier list, some of whom aren’t even adults let alone companies, and the policy says that each new supplier needs to go through a thorough vetting process.

Seen in a code review (paraphrased):

“Why does this break when you add comments in the middle?”

Sure, but doing a fact check at all is very strongly suggesting that the person making the claim is lying in a way that would be materially significant.

It just seems wrong to report that well technically, the candidate himself didn’t say those exact words (while ignoring that he communicates like a mafia don), and fit it in amongst other fact-checks where the candidate is literally libelling an entire community with things that are absolutely bare-faced lies with very very racist underpinnings?