Peacepath

Your graphics make me feel as “nationalism” being a rebranded “patriotism” to maintain the basics of a concept that was fadding away. And for the few I know, both were mostly used as an excuse to make some poeple fight those from the other side of the river, and to make believe in a natural difference between “us” and “them”.

I don’t understand well why “them” should be excluded of the good aspect you are refering to.

As long as one of us isn’t abble to afford one of this, no one is really free ; as we won’t be free from the fear that situation could affect us or some of our relatives…

The official economical theory says that their is no relation between the wage and the income ; since you would (obviously?) work twice longer per day if your wage was halfed (unless you are lazy).

It is a bit hard to find examples where workers really accepted to do so, at least up to that point… because those who work hard are lazy and don’t deserve to become rich, unlike the kids of shareholders (or else the system would be unfair, since they receive more than workers…)

Giving money to poors, they would spend it and increase economic activity. That would create more money and therefore pay back that was given to the poors. But they would not be that poor anymore, and teenagers would cost far too expensive for the bilionaires’ pleasure (and most would even just refuse). As long as the choice is let up to the richests, the poors won’t be founded but by fear…