They are strange, but in an ordered way. They are using commas when a complex noun phrase ending in a noun of the same number is the subject of a clause. (See what I did there?) I wish they used a different punctuation mark, to be honest, but I get how it reduces the number of possible readings that the mind has to juggle.

“It’s possible” is a god-awful basis for a political strategy that involves electing a known fascist.

Or it could be like ww2, where it gives the world a common enemy to defeat.

Who cares? Having a common enemy to defeat isn’t a “good” thing, this isn’t a superhero movie. It’s a sign that evil people have become too powerful. Millions of people died in WWII as a result. And fascism is still going strong around the world.

There are a lot of very clearly known things, and accelerationists ignore all of those in favour of a crackpot theory of social change.

Why are you equating the people who criticize non-voters and Trump voters with the Democrats? I will criticize non-voters and Trump voters all day long, but I am not a Democrat; I am not even American.

Your framework suggests that only Democrats have agency (and you also rhetorically equate the party and its voters, which isn’t reasonable), whereas non-voters and Trump voters don’t.

In reality, everyone has agency, and everyone is affected by large-scale social forces. I see lots of people on all sides doing everything to limit their side’s responsibility. Everyone is responsible for the role they played in this election.

I know plenty of supposed leftists (really these are people who spend 90% of their time criticizing liberals and calling them “shitlibs”) who are relieved that Trump is in office, say that he is better than Kamala on Gaza, and believe that America’s descent into fascism will spur a revolution that will save humanity.

Don’t underestimate people’s stupidity.

Murder is still murder regardles of numbers.

Man, what the fuck? Does it register with you how fucked up it is to dismiss the difference in how many will die under a given administration? You do agree that quantitative differences are real and have moral importance, right?

Yes they are. Some people don’t vote out of apathy, but others don’t vote as an explicit leftist stance. This has a long history going back at least to the 1800s. It’s a shit stance, but unfortunately pretty popular.

And also, the idea of “choice” is bullshit anyway. People who don’t comply with their doctor’s recommendations generally have reasons for doing so, such as depression, insecurity, and horrible side-effects to medication. Good healthcare finds and addresses those reasons instead of just blaming people for being affected by them.

Probably the parts where you said “Biden has given Israel everything they want”, which is blatantly false, and your statement that “They are doing the same amount of genocide”, which cannot be meaningfully assessed when the genocide in Gaza only ramped up under Biden – and there is good reason to believe that Trump would, in fact, be much worse.

The Dems are evil, but being dishonest about their flaws is foolish, unproductive, and deserving of censorship.