Why do they frame it as rights? Let’s start with not fucking killing them, I’m pretty sure that’s a little more fundamental than rights.
Because traditional news have drilled into many people’s head that there are no innocents there, at all.
Some of them are so delusional that they think phrases like “Stop killing children” is said in support of terrorism. It’s honestly 1984 levels of brainwashing.
Why are dems endlessly talking about what messaging they should do?
Because it’s all about the optics. They don’t actually do any of those things, they just want people to think they are.
It’s intentional.
The people who put them into those positions of power want their money. Him firing these people will cause deaths and people will demand a solution. Then they’ll announce some “amazing” private solution that will be worse and cost more.
None of the documentation or statements by US officials are consistent, and appear to include a bit of lying. So people are leaning towards him being at least partially correct in his accusations.
In short, they saw the picture and then began an extended interview where they made a bunch of false claims, and used made up reasons to deny him. Then later claimed they used more reasonable argument, which also doesn’t really hold water.
While that’s one part, they had to say something because of that picture of his legs.
CVI can cause swelling like that and is sort of treatable, but at his age another common cause of that ankle edema is late stage heart failure. As in “probably wouldn’t last term” late stage. And that rumour spreading would cause him major issues, like people spending more money on Vance than him.
It’s so weird listening to people like that.
They’ve spent so much time metaphorically jerking eachother off and gassing eachother up, that they don’t realize their projection is VERY obvious.
I know Jerry Seinfeld is a creep and along with Jason Alexander they’re both zionists. Michael Rirchard had that whole racism incident. But what did Jula Lous-Dreyfus do?
No.
Camp means encampment. Which refers to temporary or light shelter, usually for a group. And the term “concentration camp” is from the 1800s.
The big thing is that admitting earlier could prevent it going as far as it has in the past.
American media is in the “if we say it out loud, it’ll become true” phase.
Just to be clear: Snopes is not trustworthy, they lie with clear political motivation.
They’re not even trying to hide it, as they said “The available evidence is too scant to draw a solid conclusion.” about Elons saluting.
You can still control a drone, get on the bus!
-Fascists
It’s not about shortages, it’s about labor. They’re bringing back the “company store”, they’ll get import excemptions and similar and force people to them and lock them into a system they can’t escape.
It makes it so people can’t save money, can’t move, can’t rise in the class system, etc… They can only work.
Edit for clarification: Around the 1900s and earlier, some companies would pay salaries in company credit, not cash. The credits could only be used in the company store, not the general store, or other company stores. So they were literally unable to save up any money or do anything but keep working for the same company until they died. And this would be easily implemented now, by giving company stores special benefits in terms of tariffs and regulations. Forcing less fortunate people into was if effectively servitude.
Him, RFK, the other heads of departments and agencies they’ve instated, etc. are mostly just morons put there to take the blame.
And media(social and traditional) is eating it up, constantly mocking their stupid statements while ignoring the real scary stuff being pushed by the people behind them with the money.
It’s just back to projection about “the swamp” and billionaires controlling politicians.
That’s the thing, they know that. Trump just thinks he’s “winning” as a master negotiator.
There are a bunch of smart people who know what they’re doing, but they’re pinning all the blame on the useful idiots like Trump, RFK Jr., Leavitt, Bondi, etc.
Is it morally wrong for an entire nation to bait their despot into increasingly deranged ego trips?
Nope.
The more deranged you can make him a appear, the more people are willing to distance themselves from him.
The second once, since the attorney general is a fascist.
There’s a very high chance that most of them no longer work. Although if even just 5% of the ones deployed are working, that’s still over 80. Which is more than enough to start WW3.
And it’s almost unthinkable that they haven’t kept strict maintenance on at least a few.
At this point it’s basically just propaganda to give the illusion that something is being done.
Just look at the people in charge of the Democratic party. Especially the ones who are planning to die in office to leave behind a legacy.
They’re just conservatives in sheep’s clothing. They’ve done the bare minimum to seem left leaning, but they’re currently clinging to power and are refusing anyone with “socialist” views to get any power. They’ve been blocking Bernie for over a decade, they’re making sure AOC doesn’t make big tweets that would overshadow their Newsom puppet, the DNC changed their rules to prevent new blood, etc.