mlunar
- 5 Posts
- 12 Comments
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
1·11 months agoOh interesting! Thanks for explaining :)
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
2·11 months agoThanks for the explanation, makes sense! This app relies quite heavily on in-memory caches, so it’s somewhat incompatible with that model :)
That said, I wonder if the startup time would be noticeable. Depends a lot on the configuration, but it shouldn’t take more than a few 100ms (esp. if you use skip_collection_counts).
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
1·11 months agoThx! Out of interest, what is your use case?
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
3·11 months agoI don’t know a lot about fastcgi, but looking it up it seems like it also keeps a persistent process running to avoid execution overhead, but I don’t know how that process is managed 🤷♂️
Either way, you could use a supervisor of sorts that shuts down the process/container after some idle time (at least for containers I know some exist) and that should probably work fine (outside of interrupting scanning operations).
I haven’t tried it myself yet though :)
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
3·1 year agoThanks for trying it out! Let me know if you run into any issues or have some ideas :)
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.20.0 released: dark mode, photo details, best scrollbar, better map, more search filters, etc.English
4·1 year agoHey thanks! The Immich folks are doing an astounding job indeed :)
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield Part 1: Origins: Gallery Begins: The BeginningEnglish
1·2 years agoLet me know if you encounter any issues! ☺️
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield Part 1: Origins: Gallery Begins: The BeginningEnglish
1·2 years agoHmm, I’m not sure I understand exactly. By default it uses each subfolder as an album / collection that you can pick on the home page. You can also configure custom collections/albums consisting of arbitrary directories. You could also configure e.g. an “all” collection with all the photos combined by listing the root directory(s). Is that what you meant?
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield Part 1: Origins: Gallery Begins: The BeginningEnglish
2·2 years agoThanks! Do you mean explorer-like folder browsing?
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.15.0 released: Google Photos alternative, now zoomier than ever! Plus related image search, map view, arm64, tags (alpha), and more!English
1·3 years agoI’d say Immich has quite a few more features, with the primary focus of backing up your media from your mobile devices with a more “managed” approach (it takes care of storing and organizing the files).
Photofield is more minimalistic (both in terms of user interface and as an application) and more useful if you have an existing directory structure that you want to view as a gallery. It also pulls a few neat tricks to make it work smoothly with up to ~600k files.
See also the linked comparison for more details. It’s mostly accurate, though video is a bit better with this release.
mlunar@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Photofield v0.15.0 released: Google Photos alternative, now zoomier than ever! Plus related image search, map view, arm64, tags (alpha), and more!English
1·3 years agoIt’s quite impressive how much the Immich folks have achieved in a relatively short period of time! I’m glad you found something that works for you :)


Thanks! Hmm, not sure what you mean, that I shouldn’t install devDependencies when building the release? That’s a good point, I’ll need to look into it