You don’t even understand enough to get why the comparison is relevant.

People said LITERALLY the same thing about ADHD. You’re straight up mistaken in your thinking, and you need people like me to tell you that because you refuse to learn about the things your criticizing on your own.

But you’re probably just going to accuse me of bias and ignore me. That’s what all the other science deniers do, too.

Being pro vaccine doesn’t excuse you for using anti-science and prejudice to attack other medications.

Maybe you should learn more

I don’t care

That’s what I’m talking about. You’re attacking a medication without understanding it and have an active desire to not understand it. You’ve made up your mind, in ignorance, and are using your prejudice to justify advocating against that thing you refuse to understand.

I see this exact attitude with all sorts of science deniers from Flat Earthers to racists. It makes the world a worse place. Stop it.

Came here to make this point.

You can be sure that when a person like DeSantis says “death to pediohiles” they’re thinking of trans people, not Trump.

The craziest part is that the GOP would still run advertisements against him calling him a communist socialist fascist far left radical that wants to trans everybody and give all our money and jobs to those lazy freeloading illegals that he paid to vote for him.

No, actually, the craziest part is that MAGA would believe them.

As far as we know it’s not actually using any facial recognition at all.

It could just be using the scanned face to generate fake evidence of non-citizenship. It would be SUPER easy to make an app to do this using generative AI. You know, like Grok.

Not arguing your conclusion, but to answer the question regarding the question

Just appealing a ruling doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to follow the ruling. He still has to follow the ruling until a judge, any judge involved in the case, says that he doesn’t have to follow the ruling as either a temporary stay of said ruling or a permanent judgement.

So if he doesn’t do as ordered (and I agree that he won’t) he is 100% in violation of the law AND the judge’s orders.

But also he’s immune to prosecution for official acts, so why should Trump give a shit about any of that?

They think they can bribe fascists for favorable outcomes, but what they’re still in denial about is that fascists do whatever they fuck they think will get the m them the most power in any given circumstance, including going back on promises (money paid, money taken), extorting for more money, and throwing anybody they want Uber the bus.

There’s no making deals with fascists, there’s only getting scammed by fascists.

Do you have a source so I can learn more about this?

I expect the White House to add “wearing a chicken suit” to their list of signs that somebody is a terrorist any moment now.

Fascists say whatever gives them the most power in any situation, reality really isn’t a factor.

They know, and they don’t care. They’re fascists; what’s allowed for them isn’t allowed for their opposition, because fairness is for the weak.

And the lesson the DNC learned was “try harder to appeal to fascists”

You know, like we said they would because that’s been their reaction each time they’ve lost over the last forty years

Turns out they were just fascists who will say whatever they think will gain them the most power in any particular situation, and they never actually cared about anything but that power.

Now that going after pedophiles doesn’t get them power, they don’t care. But don’t worry, they’ll revive that rhetoric when they decide it’s time to go after “groomers” (ie LGBTQ people)

Russia is very good at maintaining plausible deniability for things like this. Like the polonium in the tea. Everybody knows, but there’s no proof that Russia was behind it, which makes it harder to take action over it.

Why would Russia put itself at risk by directly taking out an under cover CIA agent when they can just publicly reveal the agent’s identity and let things take care of themselves?

Right? Headline should really read “Trump admits Epstein list is real, defends some of the people on it.”

In my previous comment “good” is synonymous with “least bad” which apparently isn’t obvious enough despite my previous clarification about the world not being black & white.

So no, when faced with multiple options, all of them bad, picking the least bad option ISN’T the same as picking the most bad option and therefore a person picking the least bad option can’t reasonably be “shit on”

Not having a good choice doesn’t excuse making bad choices.

It’s --almost like-- we live in a world that not black & white and people have to make the best choices they can under the circumstances

Of all the other criticisms people have had of Newsom, you’re only posting about his relationship with Israel. This suggests an ulterior motive or a bias on your part.