• 0 Posts
  • 165 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 26th, 2023

help-circle


  • I get looking at terrorism as a simple data point and then saying left wing terrorism is on the rise. When there’s more violence then it’s indicative of underlying problems.

    But most of the time the conversation implies people need to clean up their act. Politicians must stop using charged language. People must chill out.

    In that vein, I’m curious how much left wing violence is real. When people are getting shot down for trying to get abortions, getting put on lists…

    That’s like playing half a chord progression.

    But when you fight back, that’s also a terrorism. Hitting the bully is still violence, and can’t we all just chill?? Lmao


  • If groceries cost us $500 per month and our government says it accepted $10 from an anonymous donor to help pay for next months groceries, what does it mean?

    Like what just happened? Did they just make a joke / are they fucking with people?

    Are they only funding their gestapo? Are they strategically activating specific personnel via a check, and ignoring less critical or more motivated soldiers?

    It’s as if someone threw some coins at the crowd just for a chance to talk about how it’s the Democrats who “opted” not to pay them. I wish they more deliberately explored the “it costs billions to pay the military yet the 130 million is gonna do… something” part of the story.





  • Why not just use AI to synthesize a dead cop or two? Anthropic is literally dedicated to creating an AI powered hegemony where AI is used for the “greater good.” They barely have a product and they’re working to empower brutal dictators.

    When was the last time MAGA was presented with evidence and they just went “oh, I was wrong.”? Antifa is going to start murdering 7 fingered cops* and Facebook won’t give a shit.

    *(except fingers aren’t a problem anymore)






  • I stopped reading at the part where they say provocateur is the wrong word and how using the wrong word diminishes the overall piece.

    After all, these people are not propagandists. They don’t spread hate as a means to an end. Hate and xenophobia is not a tool in their arsenal. It’s not a “take it or leave it” proposition.

    It’s crazy to paint maga as a bunch of calculated leaders who only care about procedural theories and abstract policy, and it’s just their followers who believe the hype.

    And because the author used the wrong word I guess that means this article is overall worse for it.

    Edit: and the aggressive headline! I guess if their editor used the wrong words then the article must be worse than I thought.