That’s an apologist’s take not a scholar’s take. Modern translations use “small boys”.

Yes like yesterday. The silhouette is definitely not the way a horny man would typically depict a sexy adult woman.

Which is to say it’s a sketch of the torso of a girl that has only started puberty.

Wikipedia says it’s attributed to King David but doesn’t give more context. Maybe cursing someone that betrayed him?

Is this post text written by AI? It seems very, “no, but yes, but maybe”. It’s like it’s written by an LLM trained on clickbait.

Shouldn’t that be like contempt of congress or something?

we’ll do everything we can to make sure approvals happen quickly… …and routinely

So you’ll do nothing because that would change the routine?

Just like how the law equally prevents the rich and the poor from sleeping under bridges.

Yeah I don’t think there’s any basis to the quote.

Interestingly the earliest composed Christian document that has been recovered (the didache, the copy we have is from Ca. 1000 CE, but seems to be in the original Greek) condemns infanticide, specifically including by exposure to the elements. It also prohibits private property so the document is not taken authoritatively by many modern christians.

And the new one is NORTH American.

People using “American” to refer to anyone from the western continent (from a euro centric perspective) is conventional in some parts or the world. It’s not the convention in Canada, we bristle at the thought of being labeled Americans.

Mate I’d be buying a car that ISN’T American, because international manufacturers would be diverting supply away from America. I have and use a bicycle, but it’s difficult to bicycle to the ski hill with my family’s skis.

As a Canadian shopping for a car should I expect price drops due to diverted supply?

I think you still haven’t provided enough context:

They played each other earlier in the tournament in Canada and the Canadian fans booed the US national anthem

…due to America’s leader denying Canada’s sovereignty, and launching a tariff regime intended to cripple Canada’s economy.

In this game the Americans booed Canada’s national anthem, while in a sense retaliatory is also a doubling down and refusal to acknowledge the legitimacy of Canada’s grievance.

What unhealthy eating habit are you indulging in at 21:45?

If the certification of Trump’s election is delayed past January 20th, what happens? Would his accession to power be delayed? Could he use this delay to justify postponing the next election?

What happened in Saskatchewan?

Don’t worry this could be the last one

This is the level of critical thinking that conservative pundits are exercising.

The idea behind tariffs is to increase the prices of imports so that domestic production can compete. Higher prices are definitely the point, but the idea is that at least with domestic production the price increases get circulated back into the domestic economy as jobs/wages. But, if the domestic economy can increase production without increasing wage expenditure then the money from the higher prices just goes to the shareholders.

If it’s something for which there is no domestic production, it’s just a tax, and it should become a question of what does money from the tariffs get used for… probably taxcuts for the rich.

I agree that the problem is not with him being on the ballot, the problem is that it seems an enormous portion of the population of the USA are willing to vote for him.

“Pricing according to market conditions”