





You asked why and I gave an explanation where the 27 downvotes came from. So I think there is some agreement within this lemmy about being offtopic.
If that bothers you too much I suggest focusing on something more productive, as I will do.
Not selfhosting AND privacy.
From the sidebar of this lemmy:
“A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.”
So its about self-hosting with certain qualities (not giving up privacy or lockin). Not about privacy in general.
Signal isnt selfhosted and does lock you in, albeit with a high reputation to not become evil.
Better lemmy would be https://lemmy.ml/c/privacy
Nothing to do with selfhosting
I am dutch and spend many an hour at the intersection of IT and Privacy … but this is the wrong community to advertise a local Signal group.
Its not like Ikea standardised that for use in dozens of cabinets …


I also like to measure in jetwing money … This is like half a jetwing.


Dont know much about it, but would Droidian or Mobian be feasible? https://devices.droidian.org/#/devices
Another scenario would be all universities cooperate in one instance, like Surf does for all Dutch universities and colleges for vocational training.
Reading your post earlier and got me thinking: are there more then one community type? As in …
There are FOSS communities which members find each other for FOSS sake.
But a more divers sort of community often gathers around the application.
For example, the OSMand community consists of cartography enthousiasts AND developers and everyone in between.
Although I like your app (intention and application, no scope creap etc) it doesnt unite users around a common goal. Which doesnt matter much because its still usefull.
Another example would be: Recently a website to convert student tests scores to grades started to ask money. If a FOSS app would provide this the community would consist also of teachers and test grading people.
Must admit, those fields are precisely the ones I use in my filenaming convention. Other DMS put that in their databases but alas that’s just trading one stack for another.
Other ones put it in XMP metadata of the pdf themselves. But I guess the work involved would be similar.
I don’t know.
My main point is: Why would you want a mail specific stack of hosting, storage, indexing and frontends? If it’s all plain text anyway so the regular storage solutions for files come a long way.
There is an entire industry (which has its own disadvantages) to get communication artefacts out of those systems and put it in document management systems or other forms of file based archival.
I had roughly the same goals ( archive search 2 decades of mail) but approached it completely different: I export every mail to PDF with a strict naming convention.


Because the actual export, transform and loading of multiple banks and accounts data is cumbersome its holding me back.
So curious to read about GoCardless.
But is that also for consumer?
And is it this: https://gocardless.com/pricing/


Got a work related variant, a 3 letter domain we really liked was registered by a person asking a couple of hundred bucks or so. Which really was a good deal and we were more then happy to pay.
Our IT department advised guiding the transfer themselves. Instead our marketing department went ahead anyway and just agreed to “you end your subscription and after that we register it” … instead of using transfer codes.
In the minutes between, a bulk claimer snatched it away.