So it’s correct to refer to a Nazi being hung then.

So is it pronounced “Jizz-lane”?

Reminds me of that new weapon the charismatic church has developed.

Every so often someone yells a warning of “Glow Ray!” just before half the congregation fall over.

Bison bison Bison bison bison bison bison Bison bison bison.

Perhaps we can nominate Trump for the Bellend NoPeace Prize.

How do horses solve that problem?

One of the most awesome things about Trump is the way he was able to stop that genocide so quickly.

Micro SD.

Not if you have Firefox open. Three YouTube tabs and my 4GB Pi5 is swapping so hard it takes forever to move the mouse anywhere.

This works for both positive and negative numbers:

private static bool isEven(int number)
{
	bool result = true;

	while (number < 0)
	{
		number = number - 1;
		if (result == true)
			result = false;
		else
			result = true;
	}
	while (number > 0)
	{
		number = number - 1;
		if (result == true)
			result = false;
		else
			result = true;
	}
	return result;
}

Output:

isEven(4) = True
isEven(5) = False
isEven(-4) = True
isEven(-5) = False

I think that’s about the polar opposite of where we’re going with this.

I’m sure the Israelis expelled from other countries where land was stolen from them will be pleased to hear this.

Oh, can “aliens” start political parties in the USA?

Imma start a “British Colony” party over there; anyone want to join me? MAABCA.

Maybe it’d be a good idea to use a word other than death, which is clearly being misinterpreted to mean killing people. “Dissolution of [x]” obviously isn’t as snappy, but it’s an improvement at least in terms of accuracy of intent.

OK, so what’s the plan for bringing death to the USA without killing a single American?

The Norks Kims are world leaders and KC3 isn’t? Did I accidentally stumble into a .ml echo chamber?

On looking at the OP’s list I was also wondering why Trooping the Colour wasn’t on it, as it is a military parade for the (official) birthday of one of the leaders in the G7.

King Charles III is not symbolic; he is the ruler of the UK and the Commonwealth. He refers to Parliament as “my government” in his speeches and no new laws can be passed without his approval (Royal assent). He is the head of the military and the Church. So referring to Charles as a symbolic figurehead is factually inaccurate. Deferring power to Parliament doesn’t change that. Taking it up again may cause a constitutional crisis, but I believe it is an option.

This seems like a fairly reliable source, on the grounds that although it’s “only” a blog, solicitors aren’t known for posting misinformation. https://www.milnerslaw.co.uk/could-king-charles-iii-dissolve-parliament/