You’re reaching a lot in your “theory” trying to attribute logic (however few of it) to the ramblings of a delusional, unintelligent and dementia riddled old man. I do not believe for a second that there’s any logic other than “big number make me feel good”.

And the deception part would require him to understand and accept that he was wrong, which he’s shown to be completely unable to do numerous times.

There’s a big difference between pointing out their strategy and telling people not to react, and all I read here is the pointing out.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Wait, do I understand you correctly? You seem to think that had the US fought against their own Nazis, you wouldn’t have any Nazis in Europe? How does that make sense?

Damn you really think that only your vision is the acceptable one. To the point where your “argument” devolves into insulting those that don’t see it like you do.

Stop it. Get some help.

Forcing a whole table full of people to deliberately be ignorant and pretend to “discover” things that they already know isn’t fun, it’s tedious

That’s like, your opinion man.

Seriously, that is an opinion yet you write it as a general truth. Please don’t do that. There are tables that enjoy the role-playing aspect more, including “my character wouldn’t know that”. I would know, I’m part of one table like that.

I’m unable to visualize things in my mind, are you actually saying that it means I cannot self reflect? That’s certainly a take… Also one that is not presented in the aphantasia article you linked, so I wonder where this jump in logic came from.

Feels like you just don’t know what aphantasia is, even though you linked an article about it. And what’s this “aphantasia from the inner self”?

Is it truly a bad strategy? Or is there much less direct action than what’s needed?

Thank you for that, I love how weird they are!