why is Louis CK taking a math test?

if the template requires specific knowledge of the scene or movie context that is largely irrelevant to the joke then it’s the wrong template.

I shouldn’t have to read deep into the comments in order to get it.

except not via mobile devices. you have to pay for the app to work.

what about murder in war? is all the murder in Gaza wrong?

I agree with this comment. but that doesn’t change the fact that you’re a disingenuous dickhead.

aoc wants status quo? that’s a daft implication.

what’s it like being part of the problem?

I think the original meme would have been better with Trump instead of Hitler. but it’s really no less a scathing reality for evangelicals

finally, a tolerable use of POV.

what illiterate demon possessed you to write “it’s I guess nice” instead of “I guess it’s nice” ?

lol, where’s dufusbaan?

deleted by creator

lol, who’s the one who refuses to open their mind? you admit you only know a little bit on the topic but have argued against multiple people who clearly have greater experience and understanding. everyone in the thread who disagreed with you and commented was met with such a cliche double down. it’s just so painfully obvious and typical.

it doesn’t matter if you believe us or not. we still know that it’s a nonsense issue to latch onto for a presidential campaign and a piss poor reason to promote an unhinged candidate. personally I’m much more interested in wealth inequality, the massively growing homeless population, corporate greed, preventing further genocide and other such actual important issues that are causing real human suffering right now. fuck off about open source being relevant as a remotely important issue worth choosing a candidate over.

I remember doing this when I was young, stupid and unable to admit I might be wrong. you really make it seem like you’re doing that same thing. I do hope one day you look back at yourself and shake your head in embarrassment. that’s what I do when I think about how I used to argue like this with people who actually knew what they were talking about.

you have absolutely no idea what I stand for. I’m a strong supporter of open source. but of all the real and significant problems in the world this is an abysmal issue to focus on for a presidential candidate. and frankly it’s a pathetic hill to choose to die on. try putting some energy into issues that could actually cause meaningful improvement to the problems we are facing instead of getting suckered into debating a topic about which you know VERY little.

well I am a senior software developer so… again definitely an expert in this field. what credentials do you have?

it’s not a challenge. it’s just dumb and enough smart people know better than to waste their time doing something useless.

wait it doesn’t matter who looks? hmmm ok you’re trolling. oops I did it again.

“we” ? who do you think is going to be doing the looking? it sure as hell wouldn’t be you because you clearly don’t know shit about fuck.

I get that you really think you’re onto something here. you’re not. it’s never going to happen and it wouldn’t effect any meaningful change for society if it did.

ya got duped by a politician’s campaign-speak. let it go.

If users give an app permission (which they always do if they want to use it), please enlighten me on what data you think an app collects that is more than it should?

Are you daft? Yes. We know what they are doing. Apps inherently have access to a lot of user data. It’s not about trust in the code, it’s about trust in the company. No amount of looking at TikTok’s source code changes what the company may or may not do with all that data it is absolutely collecting.

If you examine the source code of all popular apps you will find that they all collect and send home as much user data as the user has permitted, which is usually a lot. This information accomplishes nothing. The reason that some apps should be banned is because of what the company does with that data and how it doesn’t comply with laws from the banning country.

This all stems from a useless talking point made by a politician which sounds great but doesn’t actually accomplish anything. Feel free to keep arguing, but at this point you’re basically just telling me that the internet is a series of tubes.

you’ve strayed from your original argument. the context is that you’re supporting a lunatic because he thinks that looking at source code is somehow better than banning foreign apps outright. we already know what these apps are doing and source code doesn’t give any further insight.