

I would say that the counter redistricting is definitely in line with that.


I would say that the counter redistricting is definitely in line with that.


Sure, here is one of my guesses, though the site is actually pretty complicated, so this is a very simplistic reason as an example. Assuming they use a static site generator. Each Article is it’s own WYSIWYG. They have a special document format that allows for inline notation of annotations. Someone was editing the doument to update an annotation, they left out a closing bracket and the SSG just decides to not render invalid annotations, so everything after the missed closed bracket was assumed to be bad data.


It’s not “ok”, it’s an obvious mistake. I only emphasize the context because people are acting like, even if this was intentional, that it has any effect.


The LoC annotated constitution website is not connected to the executive branch and not a source of record.


Does no one know the difference between the executive branch and the Library of Congress?


Ok, everyone ITT needs to calm down. Do you really think this is some roundabout attempt to amend the Constitution? Obvi it is an issue, but there are many many ways this could happen.
People act like it is somehow impossible that webpages can’t get corrupted.
My bet, they use a static site gen, someone added some unclosed escape sequence while making changes to an annotation in a document and the SSG built it anew with the rest of Article 1 being left behind.


What do you mean?


Good thing we know exactly what they meant in the second amendment.


I use uppercase “Conservative” to indicate Ia.talking about the modern brand name vs. the lowercase “conservative” to talk about the actual political term.
And while Schumer did not ultimately vote yes on the bill itself, his advocacy and yes vote on the cloture motion likely secured Friday night’s outcome.
This was about cloture vote, I doubt they will vote yes to the bill.
Given everything you have seen since Trump took office, do you think they don’t want a government shutdown? RN so much of what the administration is doing is illegal, Democrats have no legislative power to curb that, but they can keep receipts and deal with it in two years. If the government shuts down, the administration will have the actual authority to decide what is “critical” and will furlough the rest until they all are forced to quit and find other work. A government shutdown effectively does the job they want done, and they get to blame the Democrats for it at their leisure.
I’m not sure one can use ancient Greece as an exampe of democracy not being tied to wealth.
Just that self-awareness puts you far over most.


ITT people who do not read the article


District offices are paid for from House office budgets.
The only times I hear of tankies is from how annoying they are in online forums, their only power being in their subreddits and lemmy instances. The only references to Marxists are from idiots repeating MAGA talking points.


Common dreams isn’t really that kind of site. It’s a political blog at best.


People forgetting Biden is Catholic, and Catholicism is pretty anti-death penalty.


Yeah, it seems weird that a government of a country that one is a citizen of can choose to have you killed. But assisted suicide is illegal.
Nazi was a derogatory term used against the national socialist party but was eventually embraced in defiance. Let’s not change history and make nazi some kind of honored title.