I think maybe they wouldn’t if they are trying to scale their operations to scanning through millions of sites and your site is just one of them

What about a way to donate (held in reserve for that purpose?) money after the fact for specific commits, and then have a way to indicate which things you’d be most likely to donate to going forward if they are completed? This would mean less reliable payments since there wouldn’t be a guarantee any given contribution would result in a payout, but there wouldn’t be any disincentive to work on things and there would be a general idea of what donators want. Plus doing it that way would eliminate the need for a manual escrow process.

Even if they are trying to hack me it’s only polite. Plus on the very remote chance they somehow find this and care they would have slightly more info about me.

Tried setting this up, caught a few already

Ring, etc are either slow or not responding

Nice.

Should have a fire trap that works on a timer, but also activates from a pressure plate. You think you’ve got it figured out, then fwoosh, incinerated.

For me I get prompted with a captcha on redeeming a free game, almost every time

How would it get past the captcha? EGS always has a complicated captcha

I use a script I wrote that plays music from Bandcamp with probabilities based on liking/disliking songs and the albums Bandcamp recommends in association with the rated song. Wary about sharing it anywhere though as it’s definitely against the tos.

“There should be no hesitation for us as a city to ensure that we’re not providing – and I’m reading from the resolution — any information to any individual or out-of-state agency or department regarding the provision of gender-affirming healthcare,” he said.

So this is about maintaining information privacy from other parts of the government that are potentially malevolent? Seems like a good idea.

I’m skeptical the market is ever going to have principles, for every person that has gotten burned and become personally aware of shady practices, there are many more that aren’t aware and don’t have the incentive or ability to do research to find out. Seems like the sort of thing where the system is rigged in favor of scammers if consumer choice is the only regulation.

Every time I try to convert a PDF to epub or something, or OCR one that doesn’t actually have selectable text, it turns out shit. I assume the real reason people would want to get LLMs involved is that there is actually a lot of ambiguity in what a correct conversion would be, and there are a lot of PDFs out there.

For me the image is so high resolution I had to zoom out to see it, try going directly to it https://ttrpg.network/pictrs/image/ffd95bfe-89cb-4b66-8e67-a6716d85b9c8.jpeg

I upvoted because I’m generally excited by the idea of software that lets you interact with different social media via one interface. Idk if the project itself is good but it seems like a neat idea.

What’s stopping web standards from being made simple or unchanging enough for a smaller project to maintain a functional web browser?

I normally have it output toy examples of the syntax I don’t want to bother learning and then remix that into what I need. IMO it’s better than stackoverflow because stackoverflow code is more likely to be not really what you were searching for or not actually run because the author didn’t bother testing it and there’s a typo or something.