Do not slander the good name of anarchy.

Either that or he dies off before his second ever comes and the momentum of the right falters.

This fat, old and stupid strongman inspires more loyalty and has a stronger cult of personality than his replacement.

And imma be honest. I think every year not spent under fascists is a good year.

But who knows, maybe this is for the best lol. At least this scared Canada and Australia into not going fascist.

While I agree that Harris would have probably just delayed the entire thing, I disagree that this is a bad thing. Any time not spent under fascist rule is good time. Considering the massive amounts of damage Trump has wrought outside the US, he was definitely the worse option.

They are still a meter for public sentiment.

If you look at the reactions, yes, people care about it that much.

This is only good for the accelerationists.

Fascists are people. People that need to be fought, but they are people. Dehumanization is the first step to wanton slaughter.

I think the bullet tore up much of the supporting structure on that side, that’s why he slumped that way.

Fuck this vid is bad.

Honestly, fuck no. Great, Kirk is dead now. He will be replaced by 10 new sycophants and will become a martyr in no time.

What has this accomplished?

We are in the blueanon timeline

ENDLICH WIEDER KRIEG JAAAAAAAAA

Not against an excessive welfare state, against any welfare state. Not just supporting strong borders, supporting camps like Alligator Alcatraz and deportations to CECOT.

surely the -stan is just used to say “place of” and not in the same racist way that words like “Bantustan” or “Germanistan” are constructed.

Jesus.

My source is that I made it the fuck up

Yes. Just one with a good and understandable motive.

Totally fine

Correction: Britain halfheartedly tried to mitigate the famine that was caused by their wartime policies, their land grabbing practices and wage practices. Bengal exported food to Sri Lanka in the initial months of the famine, the same playbook as with the Irish famine. When Britain finally delivered aid, they tried to make it some market scheme, with loans, rice injections into the market and rice payment for hard labor. Harebrained. The Brits prioritized the war in the region over effective famine relief. That’s what Churchill did wrong.

Regarding Mao: The intent of most of his policies was to improve harvests. Of course, if you persecute your intellectuals, use the teachings of an absolute fucking moron as the basis of your policies and brand every failure to deliver as the work of evil rightists and saboteurs, you’re going to kill a shit ton of people. Maybe a skilled war lord, he was utterly incompetent when it came to managing this famine. And so was the entire state apparatus.

Lysenkoism had been the official scientific stance on evolution in China from 1946 to 1956. Sounds like he had fuck all to do with China, sure.

Several of the techniques employed on collectivized farms, such as sextupling the density of seeds or deep plowing, were solely based on Lysenkoist teaching and had a fatal impact on yields.

Lysenkoism, Anti-intellectualism and other terrible terrible policies. But hey, Mao ate veggies uwu