Jfc, he spent $20 million of taxpayer dollars to defend himself in court? Why the fuck do politicians get to use public funds to legally defend themselves?

Jfc… Aren’t those tests extremely basic, requiring a modicum of coherent short to long-term memory retention and logic?

Is there a specific reason you strictly need static ipv6?

Yeah, you can just not need/want those specific products for a number of legitimate reasons.

I don’t remember the specific post I saw that compared his tweet from a year or two ago demanding they be released and the one he made in July/August or so where he downplayed it. I did find this: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-trump-epstein-call-b2788906.html

I thought that he had retracted his call for the release of the Epstein files after the regime changed their tune on them a couple months back.

That’s fair, I agree with that.

I think the point is that if you go extreme enough on any part of the spectrum/plot/whatever, you’re going to be supportive of generally unpalatable/harmful ideology.

Couldn’t the Unabomber be debatably extreme left? Not that it really matters, because going extreme enough in either direction ends up pretty close to the other–horseshoe theory or something.

Ummm, how about it’s setting a super fucked up precedent? Even if they don’t do anything, it should absolutely not be something that’s tolerated and normalized to have armed military roaming our streets.

Why aren’t all blue controlled states viewing this as an act of war? The federal government is literally invading states against the states’ will. First LA, then DC, now Chicago? Where the fuck is the line drawn?

Serving in the military does actually have an expedited path to naturalization. https://www.uscis.gov/military/naturalization-through-military-service

But, this fascist regime doesn’t give a fuck about anything except hatred and cruelty.

The Death of Stalin.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ytA-0xTYRUo

I’ve heard it’s quite good, haven’t gotten around to watching it myself yet.

Headline is a bit misleading:

There has been no confirmation that such a proposal is on the table, and Newsweek has contacted the White House and the office of Alaska’s governor for comment. The Telegraph cited a White House statement that it did not comment “on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening.”

I loathe Trump and won’t be surprised if he does in fact offer this, but he hasn’t actually proposed it to Putin yet.

I don’t think states have the ability to wage a war like they did in the 1800s. The federal government has centralized so much power since then. Back then, all you needed were muskets and cannons and bodies. Nowadays, it’s a completely different battlefield. And guess who has ultimate authority over every State’s national guard? The DoD. I would hope that the commanders of those national guard units would pledge loyalty to the Constitution and their States before whatever the fuck this regime is, but Trump and his lackeys have been actively pushing out all commanders that aren’t loyalists.

Ahh, did not know that. That’s really fucking weird…

He has like 20 kids with over a dozen women, I don’t think this insult works very well.

Blame the SCOTUS. At least some states like Pennsylvania had their courts rule gerrymandering as unconstitutional (for their state, not federally). Unfortunately, a lot of other states still gladly allow it.

I hope this story is true. It’s still funny as hell, regardless!

It very well could be, but this has been actively negative to the regime. The fact that Trump was blowing up Murdoch personally to get the WSJ article squashed before publishing gives it a more authentic feel. But, who knows anymore. Too much awful shit going on at the same time.