Lol

I don’t, yet you assume I do. Curious.

Do you really think it’s that they “think differently” and not what they are thinking?

Yes I am

The fact that you believe any candidate is an equal gamble

Stopped reading, didn’t say that. Have a good day, or don’t, whatever.

You realize that no matter what you say, running a female for president is a gamble.

Running anyone is a gamble, there are no guaranteed wins.

You are openly admitting you are willing to gamble what’s left of our democracy at a critical juncture in American history.

I said no such thing, you don’t even know my opinion. Arguing with someone in your head is certainly very bright though, no notes.

Both female candidates who lost were INSANELY more qualified than felon, rapist, pedophile Donald Trump.

Qualifications aren’t how presidential elections in our country are won. You can stop talking about it, because it’s a moot point.

the post is about liberalism, not liberals

Beats standing up to actually existing and unfolding fascism, ig.

buddy we’re all on the internet

Ancient One and Scarlet Witch

That’s because woman

Sounds like c/memes needs better memes then.

wow an out of touch janny, never seen that before

That doesn’t make everything it creates a meme

not a meme

But you can’t change the system until you win, and in our system the only way to win is to be one of the Big Two. Bull Moose couldn’t even do it with a former president.

Hey, that’s not true!

The real effect is giving an advantage to the main party that the 3rd party is less similar to.

No, the design/implementation of the system itself results in two dominant parties. It is possible for new parties to be created, but without a change to the system, that would still result in a two party duopoly, just with different parties.

That’s true, but our system leads to two party duopolies.

There is nothing false about the two party binary

Yeah this seems like a Goomba Fallacy for sure, really wish people here wouldn’t enable those sort of things just because they agree