• 1 Post
  • 112 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 25th, 2025

help-circle


  • If you like, I’ll also ask around a bit.

    That’s really kind of you! I appreciate that. Let me look into it a bit and I’ll get back to you, I wouldn’t want you to go out of your way for nothing, but if you hear of something that might fit definitely let me know :)

    That you learned the language before can be a great help!

    I don’t want to get the wrong impression. I took a single semester of entry level German 33 years ago, so I would have a lot of work ahead of me, but when I was studying it, it seemed like I was picking it up pretty quickly. I remember how to say “Hello, Goodbye, My name is, My birthday is on, and I feel sick” lol.


  • There’s also a possibility to learn the language and a job (usually paid) at the same time if you go into a field where businesses are having trouble to find new personnel. However, these are usually not the best paying jobs

    Where would be a place to start looking for such jobs? I took a semester of German in High School (the only reason I didn’t do more was because I moved to a school that didn’t offer it) and I’m fairly confident I could pick it up relatively quickly. Low pay isn’t an issue for me as long as it’s enough to survive on. I live a very modest lifestyle. I live in a 26ft RV if that tells you anything :)

    or very physically demanding jobs (there’s a reason for a lack of personnel)

    Physically demanding would be tough for me. 3 years ago I would have jumped at the chance, but my health has taken a decline and I have developed carpal tunnel syndrome.

    I’m 51 years old if that changes things any.


  • Wow, that’s actually not extremely far off from the mark! It’s not right of course but it’s the closest you have come so far to getting a correct answer this entire conversation.

    First of all the Russian Federation is a far right oligarchic capitalist authoritarian dictatorship- and thus has little in comon with ‘Tankies’. It’s much closer to a fascist nation than a “communist” one.

    Tankie is a pejorative term for authoritarian “communists”, especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes. And even more especially when nominal ‘communists’ use or advocate for military force against other leftists to further their agenda.

    Neither Leftists nor Tankies have anything whatsoever to do with Hitler or fascism- which is a far right ideology. Nor would the divide caused by Tankies among Leftists have ‘pissed off Hitler’ in any way. He would have been delighted by it in fact, since Fascism is an inherently anti-communist ideology and Stalin was one of his main enemies.

    So, instead of having “a board full of magic buttons that (would have) pissed off Hitler”- you are just a very ill informed troll that would have pleased Hitler more than anyone.

    The USSR, the PRC, and the DPRK are/were Tankies, so you got that much right at least. However extending the definition of Tankie to include anyone that couldn’t defeat the GOP in an election is moronic in the extreme. Actually saying that is a moronic take is an insult to morons.

    On top of that, much like in many other areas you haven’t the slightest clue as to whether or not Bernie could have beaten Trump if the DNC hadn’t colluded against him- in fact many political analysts predicted that Bernie would have handily defeated Trump in 2016- and support for progressive and leftist thought has grown exponentially since then. As a matter of fact it’s probable that the DNC propping up a right wing Harris during the last election instead of a progressive was what cost us the election and put Trump in power- so the DNC would count as Tankies by your own very stupid definition.

    Considering your inability to differentiate between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, your analysis on who or what could potentially beat the GOP in an election means even less than nothing. Tucker Carlson has a better grasp of the political landscape than you do, and believe me that is a super low bar to clear.





  • It doesn’t seem like it would be that difficult to program them to do that.

    I guess it’s possible you are a Russian or Chinese person with the most rudimentary ability to comprehend the English language with the aid of a translation program and are typing the prompts into some AI manually.

    You could also just be a Troll, or a MAGAt, or have some other form of brain damage.

    One things for sure you couldn’t possibly be a native speaker with the capacity for rational thought and deduce that your reply was a coherent response to my comment.




  • Bernie didn’t dispute anything I wrote, and it’s not my word- I linked to all my sources.

    Gee it’s no wonder you are still so ill informed about this subject when you flat out refuse to inform yourself when presented with the facts.

    It’s supposed to be the Democratic VOTERS who get to choose who wins the primary, not the DNC. He wouldn’t have lost if they hadn’t colluded against him. I feel like I could explain this to a literal kindergartner and they would be able to comprehend it.

    Yes fraud, yes scandals- fucking learn to read you ignorant lib.


  • I’ve been asking that question for years and never gotten a good answer.

    Who have you been asking that question to? Yourself in the mirror? Your Teddy bear late at night? I have an extremely hard time believing that you have spent more than 30 seconds trying to find the answer to this question considering this is all very public knowledge. Despite the mainstream media trying to downplay this issue, the truth isn’t that hard to find.

    citing news articles claiming the DNC supplied Hillary with all of the debate questions ahead of time and planted audience members to ask Bernie weird questions, citing wikileaks emails

    By ‘claiming’ do you mean that the DNC were caught red handed doing exactly that?

    Did the article also happen to mention that the lawyers for the DNC argued to the Judge that the language in the DNC’s charter about being impartial and evenhanded is just “political promise” (aka, a lie) and that they are under no obligation to be impartial? That the DNC has 'every right’ to choose who they want as the candidate? There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe that isn’t the way the “Democratic National Committee” operates to this very day.

    the Bernie Sanders Campaign team dispute any such claims that DNC’s Brazile was biased.

    First of all Bernie is a real one who has class and was more focused on defeating fascism than getting justice for himself. Unlike the Crooked DNC, he puts what’s best for the country ahead of his own interests.

    The claim wasn’t that Brazile was biased. It was Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hilary Clinton, and other higher ups in the DNC that colluded against Bernie. DWS resigned as the Chair of the DNC specifically because the email leaks showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Sanders. DNC CEO Amy Dacey, CFO Brad Marshall, and Communications Director Luis Miranda also resigned in the wake of the controversy.

    In fact it was Donna Brazile who replaced DWS as interim chair of the DNC that uncovered further evidence of tampering by the Clinton campaign and related that info to Bernie- who took the news like the chad he is.

    It’s all just Hillary’s emails, bruh

    Of all the liberal hot takes this is the smoothest brained take yet.

    First of all you are conflating the Hillary Clinton email controversy the with the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leaks.

    Secondly the reason that “But her emails!..” became an ironic refrain was because every time someone would point out something illegal, unethical, or Unamerican the Trump campaign was doing, “Conservatives” would engage in ‘Whataboutism’ by uttering that phrase. Not because Hillary wasn’t caught doing some extremely shady shit- she absolutely was.

    Accepting that reality is the way forwards.

    Ironic. I’ll make you a deal. Once you learn what the reality of the situation actually is and accept it- we can work on moving forwards from there. How bout that?

    It sure would be nice if people like you could learn how to use search engines on your own. I feel like I should get paid to do this for you. I wouldn’t even bother if I didn’t think there were other libs reading this who were likewise confused and might find this info useful.




  • There’s another real possibility.

    History seems to be repeating itself. Right now the U.S. is in the “Germany in 1933” phase. If we don’t deal with the situation ourselves then it’s possible that a coalition of other countries could do the job for us, in which case “innocent” Americans will be nothing more than collateral damage.

    Who knows how much the world’s Nuclear arsenal will change the situation, but if any regime in the last 100 years is stupid and pig headed enough to try and win a thermonuclear war… that’s possibly why he says so many stupid and out of pocket things- to convince people that is definitely an option.