I agree with you, its no longer math at thst point, but the application in the service of other fields.
What I am advocating for is that math at most of secondary school level should be taught on the practical basis. Math theory should be treated as a field of specialization. Much like how language is taught after people get over the basic literacy portion.
Math is mostly taught as theory. It should be taught in practice.
Teaching people how to calculate an inventory, or taxes in a spreadsheet, is much more useful than teaching them differentials and number theory.
Its like teaching people carpentry but never having them make anything with it. You just quiz them on which tool and material they need to use.
How are Electricians needing to do so much math? Its basic calculator and lookup table stuff? I mean a janitor does more complication calculations when they dilute cleaning products and estimate how much they will need for a given room.
A and B are both incorrect, you can clearly see the photographers being positioned by Trump staffers. They don’t need to be Trump staff.
Point C is the tricky one. That does not have clear evidence of conspiracy. It would have been simpler to not have a bystander and shooter killed. People have been convinced to carry out assassinations in the past. Throw in a sabotaged firearm. But yes, there is no evidence for it.
What do you think about the flag getting lowered into the shot?
Have you seen the video of the Trump aid that runs to fetch the cameraman to take the iconic picture of him from below with his fist raised? Along with the flag being lowered down into frame for the picture.
I don’t disagree. It will not be peaceful. You are correct, Israelis have most of the power. But those in power in their government will never go peacefully.
Convinces = changed his mind
And where did it leave them today?
I think you misunderstand my intentions. I am also looking the project of zionism to be eradicated. It’s as evil as the Nazi movement, or the Islamic eradication of other cultures, or the Christian Inquisitions and crusades.
Regardless of the history and what was said/promised/agreed, the only plan that will work is one that focuses on the current population on the ground.
A secular, irreligious, democracy that erases the apartheid boundaries is the only solution that does not perpetuate the conflict.
The two state solution is inherently unfair, because as you say, each time it’s on the table, the palestinians get less and less. In a democratic one state solution, they get an equal portion relative to their population (including the diaspora)
Apart from political power, You will also need a marshal plan type reconstruction effort to uplift, the war ravaged population and protect them from extremism and external exploitation by foreign governments. Fortunately, there is enough wealth in the Israeli economy to pay for a multi-generational reconstruction plan.
Why do you think Mandela changed his mind?
Before this latest conflict, they had a lot more in common.
Netanyahu wasted no time capitalizing on Oct 7 to enact his plan for staying in power.
It really has been a failure/success of propaganda and international politics.
This is why the only chance they have is if they both give up their religions. The oligarchs are just using it to justify the violence. They need to be strictly secular. No religion in government, courts or schools.
They both just want to live. It’s the small groups of oligarchs that have convinced them they want other things. Either greater israel, or a Palestine with no Jews.
There is no way either party can get that.
Don’t forget there is a large number of non-jewish people living as Israeli citizens. Almost 30% of the population.
It’s part of the reason I would argue that a one state solution is the better option. A combined nation with one political and legal structure. That way the Current Jewish majority is diluted down to less than 50%. The only way to kill apartheid is to integrate the societies more closely. But that’s unlikely to happen as long as Israel is supported by the US and the local middle eastern nations don’t support the Palestinians though economic support and sanctions.
Military targets are valid. Not arguing against that.
Regarding the other conflicts. They had much closer power parity, so they could compete with the opposition.
Your comments make complete sense in the context that both sides have been radicalized against each other for the benefit of a very small group of leaders on both sides. They are the real enemies
There will never be peace in the region until the radicalisation cycles can be broken. That’s where their power comes from.
Why do you think he changed his mind?
The South African government supporting armed resistance has very little to do with a moral position. It has more to do with them seeking support from Iran and Russia for their corruption.
I know it’s not fair. It is brutal and inhumane.
Israel is committing a genocide Gaza to a degree we have not seen since the genocide in Dafhur.
My point is one of practicality. What does a violent attack on civilians achieve for the palestinian cause?
Say a man is in the woods with his family and they come across a wolf. The man attacks the wolf unprovoked and the wolf fights back, but the man is too strong. His only hope is that the family would tell the man to stop, or that a park ranger would notice it and intervene.
Would the wolf attacking the mans family achieve anything in its favour? Or would that erode his support with the family and the park ranger?
Normal israelis used to be more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. But regular missile attacks and air raid sirens desensitised them in recent times.
Israelis nearly got rid of Netanyahu, but attacks like Oct 7 galvanised the public behind him.
I lived the resistance of the ANC in the late 80s. Umkhonto weSiswe was a lot less prominent by then since the change in strategy. The remnants of that movement nearly derailed the entire process.
What I am advocating for is that in all similar situations around the world, armed attacks on the civilians of the other side have NEVER resulted in success. Not when there is a power disparity like this. They need to be removed from the strategy.
You misunderstand unarmed resistance. You want to shout when raped, as loud as you can.
The key thing is you can never ever take the offensive and attack israeli civilians.
It is brutally unfair, but you can never cede the moral high ground, not even for a moment.
In Russia, you abuse substances.