1·
2 years agoThere ought be a do not follow recursive links switch for it, Hoomin…
_ /\ _
Paragone
Empiricist Old-Testament Vajrayana, battered enough by life to have grown-up some, in my nearly-6-decades, autistic geek, philosopher who finds that Western philosophers are nowhere near at the level of correct-thinking of the Vajrayana stuff, & will be tearing-into Marx, etc, for their brainos ( Marx found that capitalism alienated workers, so he replaced capitalism with communism, which somehow “didn’t” alienate workers?? I’ve already cracked the underlying error, but that is a long article. It’ll happen. & so will the dismantling of the other philosophers’ bogons, the whole lot of 'em. : )
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: March 27th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
There’s a “philosopher” who the far-right techbro-oligarchs rely on, whose blog is grey-something-or-other…
I tried using wget & there’s a bug or something in the site, so it keeps inserting links-to-other-sites into uri’s, so you get bullshit like
grey-something-or-other.substack.com/e/b/a/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/etc…
The site apparently works for the people who browse it, but wget isn’t succeeding in just cloning the thing.
I want the items that the usable-site is made-of, not endless-failed-requests following recursive errors, forever…
Apparently one has to be ultra-competent to be able to configure all the disincludes & things in the command-line-switches, to get any particular site dealt-with by wget.
Sure, on static-sites it’s magic, but on too many sites with dynamically-constructed portions of themselves, it’s a damn headache, at times…
_ /\ _
How very western-centric…
Identify what the culture conserves, & then you can know what’s going on…
Do they conserve integrity?
Do they cnoserve objectivity?
Do they conserve exclusive-validity ( normal, on this world )?
Do they conserve exclusive-wealth?
Just because the ones that YOU focus-on conserve in a narcissistic/machiavellian way, DOESN’T mean that the word “conservative” magically only operates as your political-assumptions dictate.
( this point is on the MECHANISM of political-narcissism, not just on this particular point.
Politically-motivated people seem to relentlessly, throughout millenia, presume that NO perspective outside of THEIR context, has any validity.
Want another example?
Look up to the north hemisphere’s polestar, at solstices & equinoxen.
The shape that the Big Dipper forms, around the polestar, those 4 nights, is called, in Sanskrit, “swastika”.
Who “owns” it?
Hindu, Buddhist, Hopi, & Navaho?
According to White laws, the ONLY possessor/owner of it, is nazis.
It is ILLEGAL to have the Hindu, Buddhist, Hopi, or Navaho symbol in one’s possession, in some countries, because ONLY white-supremacists have VALIDITY in such laws:
non-whites aren’t valid, nazis are valid, therefore the swastika only means what they meant, right?
Narcissism.
The concept/principle goes much further, though:
Addiction’s “self inherently” bad, right?
Whites believe that, consistently.
Addiction-to-wisdom, addiction-to-growing-up, addiction-to-growing-underestanding, addiction-to-evolving, these AREN’T EVEN POSSIBLE ADDICTIONS, according to White culture…
Narcissism.
It isn’t the addiction-mechanism that is the problem, it iis the actual addiction-anchors, that is the problem.
It isn’t the swastika that is the problem, it is nazism that is the problem.
It isn’t conservatism that is the problem, it is ideological-supremacism that is the problem.
I wish humankind would quit gaslighting, but … that is too much to ask, isn’t it?
The most objective, universally-framed perspective is consistently more-accurate than the ideologically-convenient politically-motivated perspective, IF intellectual-integrity is something one is addicted to.
Feynman evolved, as a person, because he was conservative about integrity: he conserved that, & lt-go-of his misogynistic-past-nature.
That is admirable, worthy accomplishing.
Cosnervatism isn’t self-inherently what’s being claimed in the post’s perspective: that is ideological “truth”, not objectivity’s position. )
_ /\ _