

… and liars lie.


… and liars lie.


Lutra
The issue is not the tattoo. It’s that for many, his explanation of the tattoo is weak.


The question isn’t what we know. It’s that he says, in the 20 years he’s had the tattoo, he never learned who also used it, and no one else ever mentioned it to him. That is highly improbable. Its not that he has the tattoo, it’s that his justifications so far are implausible.


Now, assuming we all now know what as false dilemma is -
What is the third (or fourth) logical option? I can’t see one.


I agree. It doesn’t matter.
He claims: "For 20 years I didn’t know the thing I had permanently engraved on my body is a Nazi symbol. "


That this story needs deep investigation is illogical. The man has had a Nazi tattoo for 20 years, and said he never knew. There are 2 reasonable possibilities:
Either he is extremely dull – a disqualification from office
or
He is a liar — also a disqualification from office.
To dive into the story, is an effort to support what? a person who’s behavior has disqualified him. Or else, he is undisqualifiable, and that’s a interesting point.


makes sense.


Anyone else wonder why they would hold off exiting him? It's obvious he's more useful in office than out. But, it's inevitable that he will exit the office sooner than later, and they clearly have a plan to replace him. My nagging thought is. why wait?


people who announce what they’re gonna announce don’t have sh to say.


He also called for the death penalty for the wrongly accused central park 5. it’s been 20 years, and he remains the same


17 Hours now. And story after story of American’s being hurt, Americans asking their lawmakers to help.
decorum: a solemn request that questions use question marks.
why: differentiation - between “hey. look at what I made” posts and “anybody know how I can?” questions.