

Why is he protecting the Clintons?


Why is he protecting the Clintons?


But Newsom made funny Twitter posts.


I know he got canceled for coming out but was he in the files as well?


The only decent protest the US has had since the Civil Rights Movement was the Occupy protest and nothing came of it.
Recycling is just shipping it to Asia and they just lump ship it so even if you separate it doesn’t matter.
A lot of non-recyclable plastics get lumped in and it’s more of a landfill than recycling.
Not to say we shouldn’t recycle but that we shouldn’t use plastics.
Have they tried having their parents put them on the company board?


Didn’t he do that in his first term as well?


Or continue to release ai videos until they get bored of it.


Listing Maine’s as independent makes it odd to list them as Democratic.


Investors don’t like unprofitable companies, and the payrate would be lower than the company not doing that.


% of profits is the best way to deal with it.
All I know is that he drinks boob milk.
Part of convincing people to murder others is justification.
Yes but it’s a range. The more liberal, the less power government has until it doesn’t exist.
At least in the political sense of the word.
Can the administration control what the commune does? Laws? Policing?
If so then given time the people who seek it will elevate that position.
Public ownership under communism doesn’t mean the government (or administration to use your term without a difference) owns it. It means the population has control over whether it is helping (keep) or hurting (remove) society. And the workers are at the forefront of that not politicians or owners.
You’re aware that liberalism views landowners as a scourge of society because they make money without adding anything to the world but you cannot view said viewpoint from a communist perspective.
I’ll give you another crazy idea; political parties/governments are corporations. They will put their own survival above that of the people they represent.
Taking political science courses in university and having many books is why I can call out people using liberal incorrectly.
Communists aren’t authoritarian and the concept predates communism. (Communism is a reaction against oppression so arguing criticism against oppression is anti-communist doesn’t make sense)
If you have an administration then you create a class struggle that will lead to oppression.
You have private property because the state (public) doesn’t own it, the people do. (That’s private since you seem confused)
See you don’t know what the term liberal means.
It has nothing to do with capitalism.
Communism doesn’t have a government, that makes them liberals.
You can hate jews but hate muslims more. Does it make sense now?