Do you haul lots of stuff with your truck? It sounds like you do. Therefore, you’re not just some asshole who buys a truck for the ‘manliness’ factor. Good on you for choosing a vehicle that suits your needs.

Those who only ever haul groceries or frat boys are the ones who shouldn’t be driving trucks.

I am here for this. So many Canadians in the entertainment industry relocate to Cali. Hell, it was even what drew the NHL into southern expansion. If Gretzky had never been traded to Los Angeles, I am betting that the NHL would be confined to Canada and the northern US (places that actually get snow, goddammit!) to this day.

Edit: I know that mountainous regions in even tropical countries get snow, but the culture of hockey/winter sports in general doesn’t exist in warm-weather locales for a pretty obvious reason - people don’t experience cold winter weather there.

“I love the poorly educated”

deleted by creator

In Soviet Russia, CAPITAL own you!!

Lol

I like your optimism. But what exactly did the HRE fix?

One might argue this is very Swiss (decentralized) of them. But then, money clouds everything.

Haha, that (poker night with the boys type thing) is probably an exception. I was mostly talking about casinos.

The ‘house’ in gambling terms is the establishment in which you are gambling. It’s usually not an actual house.

I don’t think it is functionally any different; just applied to a different asset being sold. Most capital gains are from property sales, aren’t they?

I’m in favour of maximum ratios of total compensation. Stock values, dividends, salary are all added together to get a total compensation value.

Start it at something like 50-1, then gradually lower it as the actual workforce is allowed to control an increased share of the company.

There is still incentive for growth; the growth is simply distributed more equitably.

So:

A loan of $1 m is given to Mr. Richbitch McDouchebag based on owning $1 m worth of stock.

Eventually that loan has to be paid off.

When McDouchebag sells off some stock to pay the loan, the amount paid presumably enters a bank account, either in their name or in the name of a numbered company they control, yes?

That’s income. Apply tax to it before they pay off the loan. In Canada, the top marginal tax rate is 33%, so $330k minus the other marginal tax amounts for the lower brackets would be applied before this money can go to pay off a portion of that $1 million loaned.

It’s either this, or we rip up the income tax act alongside finding a different revenue stream for the government.

I’m for whatever we can get on board with most people, because I am pretty sure most of us who aren’t accountants hate filing income taxes.

If we instead got most of our money from other things that the government sold, then (a) big companies couldn’t use the same accounting tricks to hide income, as we would no longer be taxing those precious profits of theirs (b) the rest of us wouldn’t have to go through tax pain every April.

I realize that for some people, they get things like tax credits for a bunch of things like home renos, etc.

Perhaps under a no income tax system, the incentive to do these activities that reduced their income tax would have to be changed to something more tangible, like a guaranteed lower rate on utilities or something. I dunno.

Statistically, this applies to all other forms of gambling as well. The house almost always wins.