People who are susceptible to hate propaganda will find their way to it.
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•Military service will reportedly no longer classify 'divisive' swastika as 'hate' symbol
115·10 months agoIf it weren’t for people complaining about swastikas I’d almost never see one.
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump Says ‘CALL IN THE TROOPS’ to Protect Non-existent Mall
5·10 months agoPeople who actually do subversive shit don’t talk about it on public social media.
If you’re healthier consuming meat than you would be consuming a plant-based diet, you’re a statistical outlier. Most people would be healthier with a plant-based diet.
Give me a banana and lettuce pls. But those “quality” ingredients are only sold to people who can afford them.
Double SNAP on produce has been in effect in many places for many years. Food insecurity has a lot to do with the availability of fresh food, the cost of storing it, the time it takes to prepare it, variability, waste, and calories-per-dollar nowadays.
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•GOP strategist tells Americans about to lose food assistance to make ‘better choices’
3·10 months agoIf you’re defining compassion as believing everyone has the same human rights then I’ve got loads of it. The problem with the folks you’re talking about is that they don’t believe the same. Whether or not they deserve what they get or get what they deserve is out of scope for my definition of compassion.
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•GOP strategist tells Americans about to lose food assistance to make ‘better choices’
9·10 months agoWhat compassion would you like to see?
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
Political Memes@lemmy.world•A Good Christian Trad Wife Moves On Quickly with Another Woman's Husband and Doesn't Grieve
187·10 months agoShe sold merch at his funeral.
Wow a Twitter screenshot? From @LeadingReport??? I stand totally corrected and ashamed of all my previous opinions 😝
Maybe the democrats should have worked hard enough to get a majority.
So the republicans are literally incapable of governing the country without a supermajority, but the democrats are? Who would vote republican then?
Republicans control the house, senate, and presidency. Where’s the leadership?
Yeah why not just give the republicans everything they want?
Elections have consequences. If Republicans wanted a supermajority they should have worked harder on election day. Now they have to negotiate, they’re just choosing not to.
People who are actively working for change in concrete ways don’t often call attention to themselves by posting about it on public social media. If nobody in power is working to silence you, you’re probably participating in controlled opposition and not much else.
FridaySteve@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•Texas Republican Party sues state to end open primaries
4·1 year agoElections are designed to be democratic. Political parties are largely unregulated and can generally make their own rules about who they choose to run as a candidate. Remember this next time the Republicans get a big group of powerful party members together to say how much they don’t want a certain orange-tinted fascist to be their candidate, their party could have run someone else. Winning was more important. Similarly, the democrats are well within their rights and the law to have previously committed “superdelegates” or just to skip the primary process entirely and run the vice president.

I’m saying that shooting Kirk had nothing to do with hateful people finding their way to hate propaganda. If their reasons for joining a known hate group are that thin, they would have joined it anyway, or a different one, or started their own.