Nah

Yeah!

The world isn’t black and white!

I’m just replying in case you need another comment to rant at.

I see a difference between being potentially incorrect about something and willfully being a jerk.

ETA: rereading it now the other person definitely shows smugness that didn’t register when I read it the first time, even though it’s not like it’s hidden.

Sorry for being a pest that lacks reading comprehension :)

What was the goal in being a jerk about this?

Whew, that’s a lot of sarcasm.

Which congress would have voted for it?

Spoken like an agent provocateur

Spoken like an agent provocateur.

<first_half.jpg>

You had me doubting that I knew who Eric Adams is.

Well done :)

♥️

Well, you insulted him so now I agree with you. It didn’t make your argument seem weaker and like perhaps you’re the naive one. It didn’t do that, it made a compelling argument that made your position seem more reasonable. Definitely doesn’t make you seem unhinged.

Ha

It’s important to me that when someone makes a big claim they back it up. The challenge is that the article doesn’t say what was claimed.

I didn’t make the claim therefore nothing for me to back up.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13344953

“Too much effort to go look for it”

See how I give a source and a relevant quote?

Still being lazy I see

“I’m not lying, I’m lazy”

Dope

Why didn’t you quote the part where they are discussing restricting it?

Yes, blame the minorities, let the hate flow through you.

I’m gonna hold the politicians that lied to progress their career, the pundits that argued in bad faith, the clergy that put their faith aside for their political agenda, the people that sought to hide history instead of teaching it, those that worked hard to dehumanize those they disagree with, the leaders that opted for violence as a way to garner support, and I’m sure others, as responsible also.

I’m a Mets fan.

This tension is gonna kill me! :)