the Nordic states are much more successful per capita and have things like basic human rights

Look up some Ernst Thalmann quotes.

feel free to provide them.

I don’t mind communists, just tankies.

Well I don’t like social democrats at all because they’re always contriving new lies and smears to divert attention from their awful pro-capitalist politics.

“literally” lmao - spoiler they didn’t

The SPD endorsed the ‘lesser evil’ conservative candidate who went on to hand over power to Hitler.

They also killed a ton of communists, all of the above is probably why you have a soft spot for them

the social Democrats enabled fascism the whole way; they literally had right wing paramilitaries kill their left wing opposition.

you clearly would rather be goose stepping

As I have stated in other comments: “To be very clear, we never should have been there fighting in cities in an unjust war or inversion…”I will repeat it over and over again.

why qualify it? if there’s a justification does that suddenly make full-scale invasions okay?

I’m actually curious, would Afghanistan an example of another unjust war?

why does this use of force in a calculated way to avoid civilian collateral damage not make the cut but other instances do?

I’m opposed to all wars except the class war, if you’re going across the world to kill civilians in an imperial war and you joined the Marines to kill, I’m not going to have a lot of charity about the use of improvised explosives in civilian areas

do you think there was anything wrong with what the US was doing in Iraq and Afghanistan? do you think that launching full scale invasions of other countries is okay as long as there’s a justification?

the BC did not want to authorize mortars for returned fire

because civilians were in the area?

he created a less harmful indirect fire solution

It not a war crime.

So if every single incident of returning indirect fire possibly firing on civilians is a war crime, then there are a hell of a lot more war criminals in the military that need prosecution.

as far as I’m concerned every US president should be at the front of that list and it definitely shouldn’t stop there

here’s his reddit post where he’s talking about circumventing direct orders to commit even more warcrimes than he would normally be allowed to by the US military:

There’s all sorts of reasons I could point to why Graham Platner is unfit to be a leader in any leftist movement but the most glaring one is that as far as I can tell from his statements he thinks the US wasn’t engaged in anything wrong overseas.

As an organization the US military is evil and their recruitment strategies prey on poor people who want an out that doesn’t typically exist.

I have sympathy for them, but I also don’t think it applies to former blackwater mercs.

People should be judged based on where they are now, their actions in the present, and their self-criticism of their past actions.

There’s all sorts of reasons I could point to why Graham Platner is unfit to be a leader in any leftist movement but the most glaring one is that as far as I can tell from his statements he thinks the US wasn’t engaged in anything wrong overseas.

As for not being malicious or not being a criminal, here’s one of his posts where he talks about disobeying direct orders in order to commit even more warcrimes than he would otherwise be allowed to:

have fun electing Fetterman 2.0, I’m sure in another 4 years there’s going to be another social fascist with an even bigger bodycount that you guys will be pushing.

not wanting a nazi tattoo guy in leadership = identity politics; got it

The years of military service/mercenary work is the bigger issue imo, but democrats eat that shit up so of course they’re going to overlook a nazi tattoo.

It would be one thing if he did something criminal or malicious

He was a part of the US war machine for decades, you understand how that’s doing harm to people in a concrete sense? I get that he finally quit, but I consider that history worse than being a criminal, especially under our current judicial system.

They can be reformed, but I’d rather not have them in a leadership position.

I’m fine with people changing and learning from their past behavior. If he was just another person on the street I wouldn’t have any issue.

However I’m troubled by having someone who’s already demonstrated that lack of judgement and awareness pursuing a leadership position. I just can’t trust the guy on his words alone at this point. It’s a year out from the election, surely there’s other people who can run.

I love how you’re scrolling around to see if people are talking about you.

I have plenty of hobbies on top of my organizing work; thanks for the unsolicited advice tho

I can accept that for a lot of democrats this is something they’re entirely willing to overlook. It’s not a surprise because they have already been fine operating as co-conspirators in decades of US warmongering.

Your purity test is not only foolish, but will cause you to be deeply unsatisfied and let down by so much in the world.

I agree, I might be less let down by the world if I was more comfortable around people with nazi tattoos. I think I will continue to be disappointed though.

negative behavior like … not wanting to be on the same side as a former state department mercenary with Nazi tattoos.

k

his explanation left a lot to be desired, though it’s not surprising that Nazi tattoos fly under the radar as a state department mercenary.

If you’re posturing like a politically-aware leftist or calling yourself a communist, to claim ignorance of something like that just makes it sound like you’re lying because you got caught.