- 1 Post
- 19 Comments
Where can one find more context? Just looking at this tweet, it looks like she is straight up calling Elon a literal nazi.
While strictly true (calories being a measure of energy and valid for both heat and fuel potential), the difference is - unsurprisingly - small :)
Eating a large pizza (1200 kcal) straight from the freezer instead of heating it, gives you roughly 25 less kcal.
1392·2 years agoI always imagined travelling back in time 100 years and trying to explain our tech.
-“We have personal communicators available at all times, that we can use to instantly communicate with anyone on Earth.”
-“Wow! But I guess language barriers make it impossible?”
-'No, actually. A surprising amount of people in the world understand English. Also, we have instant translators in our communicators. I could contact someone in China right now and have a conversation about anything."
-“Incredible!! What sort of topics do you talk to them about?”
-“…I don’t. It’s kinda impolite to just start talking to strangers. I mostly talk to old friends from school. And my family.”
Which country allows their citizens to openly speak about and protest said war crimes?
Playing connect-the-dots by just scribbling whatever we want on top of the dots
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States_by_death_toll
Lanza age 20 was not bullied by twenty kids age 7, their techers, and a psychologist.
Ramos age 18 was not tormented by 22 kids age 9-11.
And so on.
Yes targeting an individual who is clearly responsible for human suffering is easier to forgive than murdering random children.
Comparing apples to door hinges.
The authoritarian left and the liberal left have so little in common that it’s frustrating the term “left” encompasses both.
There are other, more introspective, ways to react to widespread and ongoing negative reception.
Norwegian here. Blame entirely justified. Our greenwashing is gross and dishonest.
Thanks for answering! I was afraid it would be taken as sarcasm but I genuinely wanted to know.
If you were to give an estimate: How many of the people fundamentally disagreeing with you online are rational and honest people, and how many are US federal agents or in their employ? Percentage-wise.
That is a valid question in isolation, but bringing it up in discussions on where to vote is not leading to discussions or actionable improvements. It only functions to push voter disenfrachisement.
Not saying it’s your intention, but it is your effect.
Voting least bad is important. Don’t discourage it.
Working for better voting options is also important. Do push for that too, but find a constructive setting for it.
You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.
On this topic, I am optimistic on how generative AI has made us collectively more negative to shallow content. Be it lazy copypaste journalism with some phrases swapped or school testing schemes based on regurgitating facts rather than understanding, none of which have value and both of which displace work with value, we have basically tolerated it.
But now that a rock with some current run through it can pass those tests and do that journalism, we are demanding better.
Fingers crossed it causes some positive in the mess.
As a european it’s always been fucking WERID how americans panic and reach for their guns at the mention of socialism.
Removed by mod