- 0 Posts
- 39 Comments
9·10 months agoNo, they’ll probably push Hillary again.
The funny thing is that’s only a guess. They didn’t actually discuss silencers at all when they were passing the law.
Really should have had more positive or neutral messaging, like “nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people - maybe there is. I don’t know.”
Of course he wasn’t practicing politics the right way. Everyone knows to debate successfully you need to keep some things to yourself.
It’s not ai, stop spreading weird conspiracy theories. It’s super obvious the video was recorded live three months ago when this op was greenlit.
Yeah, cool. Now Bozo has only 36.5 million in cash. Oh, and $240 billion in Amazon stock.
And then everyone clapped?
If you cared at all you’d actually read up on the context and interpretation of the 2nd amendment.
Immigrants are responsible for pretty much all of our country’s problems. Well, immigrants and their descendents. Elon musk, Freidrich Drumpf, etc.
You’re missing it. This post isn’t anti hate hate flag flag, it’s anti hate flag therefore pro hate hate flag flag.
31·1 year agoForwards from (liberal) Grandma.
Just to clarify, he signs off in all caps so the post is officially the view of the strawman corporation.
The klinger method!
If you’re going to motte and Bailey, try not to do it in one conversation. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
So a bunch of mental gymnastics later, we have two groups: those who consent to authority, and those who comply with authority because of the threat or application of violence.
“allow” as in permit or not address… Obviously no structure is 100% successful at eliminating opposition, but without the monopoly of violence any government becomes usurped by another body that is willing to exert force.
What “anarchistic structure” has derived authority exclusively through consent, and done so without allowing other violent power structures to form?
Hook, line, and sinker