Not saying I condone political violence, but the Democratic Party has absolutely not been willing to stop Republicans “by any means necessary, even violence”.
Large parts of “the Left”, maybe; but certainly not the actual party politicians.
This seems completely counterintuitive to me, but there’s at least one poll indicating that Stein actually draws more support away from Trump than from Harris: https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-hurts-donald-trump-more-kamala-harris-poll-suggests-1970765
Sorry, to be clear, you’re saying that potential Trump voters would vote for Stein to protest our relationship with Israel?
If all third-party candidates had to vote for one of the two main candidates, I think nearly all of the Green Party votes would go to the Democrat, while the Libertarian votes would be much more of a split.
It’s incorrect. Look at the NYT. The difference is that Politico’s numbers weren’t updated after the final votes were counted.
See how that says “99.8% reporting”? If you look at the NYT, it shows the results after counting 100% of the votes, and it matches what’s in the picture.
The Green Party is far more left-wing than the Libertarian Party is right-wing.
Why would someone who agrees with the Green Party platform prefer Republicans to Democrats? I’m sure such people exist, but I expect they’re a tiny fraction of Green Party voters.
…ashamed to admit I didn’t recognize the flag, and was thinking of people saying that the two political parties are indistinguishable. That does make more sense.