

Product owner is responsible for making sure the product meets customer needs. Project manager is responsible for making sure the project is completed on time and meets the requirements that are defined by the PO.


Product owner is responsible for making sure the product meets customer needs. Project manager is responsible for making sure the project is completed on time and meets the requirements that are defined by the PO.


Oh dear God. Not everything is racism , you know
Sometimes it’s just ignorance.


Spain supported Germany in WWII. It was a fascist dictatorship until 1975. And last I checked, it is in Europe.
“Mexican” isn’t an ethnicity, and there are a lot of families in Latin America that can trace their entire family tree back to Spain. They aren’t the ones being deported.
The analogy doesn’t check out.


Fuentes is a Spanish name.
Spain is a country in Europe.
Spain supported Nazi Germany in WWII.
I’m not getting your Goldberg analogy…
I’ve only seen the image the OP shared, that’s why I asked if there’s more evidence.
It’s a huge stretch to say the picture posted by OP is a “clear picture of the dog.” If that’s the only evidence, then it doesn’t sound like anyone has proof.
That’s not what I meant by evidence. I’m looking for proof that the collar you are describing was actually on the dogs neck. Something like a clear picture of the collar on the dog along with a link to the manufacturer’s website could work.
Can you share some evidence to support that? Several other posts have asked for evidence, but so far no one has shared any.


Democrats don’t, but the progressives who caucus with Democrats do.


If we aren’t just talking about this specific instance and instead we’re talking about her attitude in general, is that really the attitude we want to see in progressive politicians?


Aren’t the progressives all on board with forcing the files to be released?


Besides RAM, what resources do you think you’re saving? Not CPU cycles or IO ops, because you’re processing the same amount of DB queries either way. Not power consumption, since that isn’t affected by RAM utilization. Maybe disc space? But that’s even cheaper than RAM.
Or more importantly: the extent to which you can self-host out of sheer luck and ignorance like you suggest is very limited. If you don’t want to engage with a minimum amount of configuration, you might bump into security issues (a much broader and complex subject) long before any of the above has a material impact.
You’re mischaracterizing what I said. My point is that running multiple DB processes on a server isn’t going to have a significant impact on system load, if all other factor are kept constant.


You seem to be obsessed with optimising one resource at the expense of others. Time is a limited resource, and even if it only takes 5 minutes to configure all of your containers to share a single db backend (it will take longer than that even if you just have 2), you’re only going to save a few MB of RAM. And since RAM costs roughly $2.5/GB (0.25 cents/MB) your time would have to be worth very little for this to be worthwhile.
On the other hand, if you’re doing it to learn more about computers then it might be worthwhile. This is a community of hobbiests, after all…


Neither, I’m trying to explain that you don’t need to know the implementation details of the software running on your server to backup the entire thing.


Where are you getting that from? The fastest and easiest way to back up any server is a full filesystem backup, especially if you’re using something like zfs or btrfs.


I’m saying this based on real world experience: after a certain point you start to see deminishing returns when optimizing a system, and you’re better off focusing your efforts elsewhere. For most applications, customizing containerized services to share databases is far past that point.


Do you have the data to back that up? Have you measured how much of an impact on system load and power consumption having 2 separate DB processes has?
Roughly the same amount of work is being done by the CPU if you split your DBs between 2 servers or just use one. There might be a slight increase in memory usage, but that would only matter in a few niche applications and wouldn’t affect environmental impact.


For most applications the overhead of running a second DB server is negligible.
Abstinence is actually pretty harmful to your health, and masturbation is healthy. I think this example is a lot closer to overeating that you realize. On the other hand, no one considers smoking to be healthy.