lemmy rldn
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nifty@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago

Biden-Harris EPA rules save $253B/yr, 202k lives; Project 2025 seeks rollback

electrek.co

external-link
message-square
10
link
fedilink
228
external-link

Biden-Harris EPA rules save $253B/yr, 202k lives; Project 2025 seeks rollback

electrek.co

nifty@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago
message-square
10
link
fedilink
Air quality rules introduced in '21-'24 will save $253B/yr and 202k lives by 2050, says EPN. Project 2025 wants to reverse these benefits.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Climate change is a global issue.

    And Biden broke fossil fuel production records trump set. And Harris passed the deciding vote to expand domestic fracking.

    So give them credit for the bare minimum local things they do. Fine

    But we need to demand they stop fucking up on the major parts

    Shipping coal from WV to China creates more pollution than just burning it in WV.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      broke production records

      Interesting way to frame “the line that has always trended upwards continued to go upwards”

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I usually hate graphs that dont start the y at zero, and it would be better if it did, but here’s the first I found

        https://www.vox.com/climate/24098983/biden-oil-production-climate-fossil-fuel-renewables

        It skyrocketed under trump, and then again under Biden.

        But like, you’re acting like this is just some personal grip I have…

        https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-BIDEN/OIL/lgpdngrgkpo/

        https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/12/us-producing-more-oil-climate-change/676893/

        https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-u-s-oil-production-reached-an-all-time-high-in-2023

        https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/jul/26/kamala-harris/fact-checking-kamala-harris-on-energy-production-i/

        But I think setting a new record for high temps year after year after year is a good analogy.

        Does it suck that it’s still happening?

        Yes.

        But that sure as fuck doesn’t mean a 10 degree increase is the same as a 0.1 degree increase in average temps over the span of a year.

        Like. How can you act that magnitude isn’t important at all?

        • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ah, this is a good point. From The Atlantic,

          entice producers in other countries to step in, as many did in the months after Russia’s invasion.

          Basically, even if the US alone dropped to zero, expect global production to boom as other places chip in to fill the gap.

          Going green at home is a good goal, but what makes climate change so hard to solve is that we have to go green globally, or one bad actor (say for example, Russia) could ruin the party for everyone, so to speak.

    • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Shipping coal from WV to China creates more pollution than just burning it in WV.

      Isn’t this exactly what Harris is trying to do though?

      Vice President Kamala Harris said in Tuesday’s debate that the Biden-Harris administration has overseen “the largest increase in domestic oil production in history because of an approach that recognizes that we cannot over rely on foreign oil.″

      Source: https://apnews.com/article/harris-fracking-energy-climate-trump-election-debate-1b86dfb4297facd0b89c487724a9e5b0

      Seems like the right thing to do - reduce global pollution in the short term by burning the stuff locally at first, while long term pushing for greener sources. Or am I missing something?

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      The first 2 months of US supplied bombs bombing Gaza had the same environmental impact as burning 150k tons of coal.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    US “Supreme” Court

    Words cannot express how much I love the use of quotation marks here.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Instead of just exposing how shitty project 2025 is (super important to do), can the media also expose and publicize the names behind project 2025? That way they won’t be able to just put a new wrap around it and call it “project butterflies and unicorns” in 2026.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    They are not too concerned about climate change seeing the bombs and weapons they are providing Israel and Ukraine is leaving an ecological disaster in its wake. The first 2 months of bombing Gaza was the equivalent of burning 150k tons of coal.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 29 users / day
  • 57 users / week
  • 109 users / month
  • 330 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.6K subscribers
  • 26.6K Posts
  • 362K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.18
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org