lemmy rldn
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nifty@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
2 years ago

The Historical Puzzle of US Economic Performance under Democrats vs. Republicans

www.belfercenter.org

external-link
message-square
3
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
75
external-link

The Historical Puzzle of US Economic Performance under Democrats vs. Republicans

www.belfercenter.org

nifty@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
2 years ago
message-square
3
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
We have heard much about the puzzle that US economic performance under President Joe Biden has been much stronger than voters perceive it to be.  But the current episode is just one instance of a bigger historical puzzle:  the US economy has since World War II consistently done better under Democratic presidents than under Republican presidents.  This fact is even less widely known, including among Democratic voters, than the truth about Biden’s term.  Indeed, some poll results suggest that more Americans believe the reverse, that Republican presidents are better stewards of the economy than Democrats.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • Encephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Article doesn’t rule out lag effects. As in “is the performance change a result of the previous administration taking a few years to take effect?”.

    I’d love to see stretch terms of one platform or the other and how they did 2nd term vs 1st for example. Does the article’s pattern hold for those situations?

    Edit: for example Obama’s 2 terms (2009-2017)

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._economic_performance_by_presidential_party

      It’s pretty obvious that it’s not just lag causing it it you look at the graphs. Look at Regan into Bush for example.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago
    Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/historical-puzzle-us-economic-performance-under-democrats-vs-republicans

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 28 users / day
  • 53 users / week
  • 117 users / month
  • 329 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.7K subscribers
  • 26.7K Posts
  • 362K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.18
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org