jordanlund@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoThe Dangerous Illusion of a Presidential Third Party in 2024www.thirdway.orgexternal-linkmessage-square180linkfedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkThe Dangerous Illusion of a Presidential Third Party in 2024www.thirdway.orgjordanlund@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square180linkfedilinkfile-text
Really you don’t need to read more than one chart: If you vote for anyone other than Harris, you’re voting for Trump:
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoOne exception proves the rule. :) But Florida is gonna Florida. There’s no question who they’re voting for. It everyone else we need to worry about.
minus-square14th_cylon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 years ago One exception proves the rule. :) No, it doesn’t. Also my point is not “how Florida voted” It is that the blue part of the right graph is clearly bigger than half, yet the text description says 48%. So the whole graph set is not really worth drawing any conclusion from, because you can’t trust the data.
One exception proves the rule. :) But Florida is gonna Florida. There’s no question who they’re voting for.
It everyone else we need to worry about.
.
No, it doesn’t. Also my point is not “how Florida voted”
It is that the blue part of the right graph is clearly bigger than half, yet the text description says 48%.
So the whole graph set is not really worth drawing any conclusion from, because you can’t trust the data.