This is not a generational issue. People are less likely to be dogmatically religious than in the past.

wrote that traditional gender roles should not be considered stereotypes

What does that even mean? Her entire thesis just doesn’t make sense. Who is even calling these stereotypes?

That’s not wrong. Just incomplete

Any result that have happened yet is hypothetical. The fact that it is possible should be immediately disqualifying

The system is extremely flawed and the cap made it more broken. Winner take all in almost every state makes it actively detrimental to the majority of voters.

No, it was directly related to what I was saying. There was no pivot.

It was part of my argument against your desire not to change what is currently broken

Don’t pretend I’m the one holding up change when your very argument was “this bad things that people rightfully hate, is actually good”

I wasn’t forcing anything. This thread was the elongated primary season. I voiced a very real issue with the current length. That fits in perfectly with someone singing the praises of a system that has not gone to the end of primary in like two decades.

It doesn’t matter how long they endure the pressure if the race never lasts long enough for the last states to get a real vote. Staggering those states doesn’t add anything to the equation.

For Comey’s. I was more concerned with these new ones. Like if whatever this power play was they were pulling, if it was hurting their revenge scheme or of it really didn’t matter much more than wasted time.

I never said it was magic. I said it was grossly skewed and broken as a system

You can also “normally” win just the smallest states, and win with states representing only ~25% of the population. If you want something more realistically fucking stupid and completely disqualifying for an electoral system

Why is America arguing on behalf of Russia’s interests…TO RUSSIA?!

Like they needed to be told what not to settle for, when negotiating peace from the conflict THEY ARE CAUSING and could stop at any time

Why even bother having an expiration date on when he can run for office… After being part of a coup attempt…

Does double jeopardy come into play if a prosecution is thrown out for not being a validly appointment AG, or is it like an annulment where it kind of never happened?

“Seeing how they perform under pressure” has yet to allow me to actually voice my opinion before the current system prevented it from mattering.

Yet they love to tell me that “every vote counts” after my vote didn’t count.

No. You can’t trust what you’re seeing is what’s being counted. You can’t trust who’s actually voting. With paper there’s a record. With bits, they can be flipped at any point during the process and you can’t really track that.

No one who programs thinks software is the solution to voting

If I need to what?!?

This is what Johnson decides to stand up to the pedophile for? Economy wrecking illegal tariffs, blatant abuse of the military, illegal diversion of funding, targeting political opponents… He ignores

But not actively harming poor people? That he will not abide

Phone would be incredible insecure. And impossible to audit.

You don’t need phone voting to get rid of the idiotic EC, either.

You got that math wrong, buddy.

It is good for the voters.

Just not the establishment politicians clothing to their power and wealth